evidoria

What works in Central African Republic

All catalogues

5
evaluated practices
53/100
average quality score
25%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Central African Republic

Drawn from: Patapaye: Mobile Salary Payments for Central African Civil Servants · Liste Zébrée: Gender-Alternation Candidate Lists for Local Elections · IBC4E — Central African Republic's $30 Million Bet on Credit Guarantees and SME Training in Bangui · Sangha Trinational Trust Fund (FTNS) — Cross-Border Congo Basin Conservation Financing (Central African Republic) · New Tech Institut Bangui — Students Build an AI Quiz-Tutor and AI-Assisted Robots at a Central African Republic School Showcase

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Effectiveness +34 pts 100 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Scalability & sustainability -45 pts 17 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -47 pts 0 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Effectiveness
100 · 66
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Sustainability
78 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Innovation level
47 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured results
33 · 57
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Efficiency
0 · 32
Scalability & sustainability
17 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
0 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48

Coloured bar: Central African Republic. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Patapaye: Mobile Salary Payments for Central African Civil Servants · 92

Liste Zébrée: Gender-Alternation Candidate Lists for Local Elections · 85

IBC4E — Central African Republic's $30 Million Bet on Credit Guarantees and SME Training in Bangui · 43

Sangha Trinational Trust Fund (FTNS) — Cross-Border Congo Basin Conservation Financing (Central African Republic) · 33

New Tech Institut Bangui — Students Build an AI Quiz-Tutor and AI-Assisted Robots at a Central African Republic School Showcase · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Central African Republic concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more