evidoria

What works in San José

All catalogues · Costa Rica profile· United States of America profile

This profile covers practices recorded under this city name in 2 countries — check each practice's own page for its exact location.

24
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 21 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for San José

San José runs work2future, a workforce development network that served 4,158 participants in 2022, placed 758 clients into employment, and assisted 300 employers across three job centers and 150 professional certification programmes. The city also launched Unleash Your Geek, an innovation challenge that received 140 team applications in its first year and raised $45,000 in partnership funding for a flood-sensor project. These initiatives reflect San José's effort to leverage its Silicon Valley location to connect residents with employment and innovation opportunities, though the evidence provides snapshots rather than longer-term outcome tracking.

Drawn from: work2future · OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · Unleash Your Geek Innovation Challenge · FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · San Jose Technology Demonstration Center · Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · San José's AI Road Safety Conditions Pilot — 97% Accurate Pothole Detection from City Vehicle Cameras

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +72 pts 100 here · 28 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +36 pts 83 here · 47 average

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +27 pts 33 here · 6 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +21 pts 58 here · 37 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +19 pts 93 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +17 pts 60 here · 43 average

Transferability / demonstrated replication +15 pts 75 here · 60 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured results +12 pts 69 here · 57 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Innovation +8 pts 70 here · 62 average

Weaknesses

Equity & inclusion -8 pts 42 here · 50 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Evaluated outcomes -12 pts 67 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence -21 pts 67 here · 88 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Effectiveness -34 pts 33 here · 68 average

Impact on gender equality -38 pts 33 here · 71 average

Curator validation -40 pts 33 here · 73 average

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 28
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Transparency, ethics & data protection
83 · 47
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
33 · 6
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
58 · 37
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
93 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
60 · 43
Transferability / demonstrated replication
75 · 60
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured results
69 · 57
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation
70 · 62
Scalability
67 · 62
Sustainability / continuity
76 · 78
Governance, certification & transferability
59 · 64
Equity & inclusion
42 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 79
Achievement / evidence
67 · 88
Efficiency
0 · 33
Effectiveness
33 · 68
Impact on gender equality
33 · 71
Curator validation
33 · 73

Coloured bar: San José. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

work2future · 100

OTAI Audit of 150 Public Platforms — Evidence Base for Costa Rica's Directriz 051-MTSS-MICITT · 96

Unleash Your Geek Innovation Challenge · 91

FONATEL Hogares Conectados – Subsidised Internet and Device Programme for Households in Poverty (Costa Rica) · 88

Costa Rica Payments for Environmental Services (PSA / FONAFIFO) · 87

San Jose Technology Demonstration Center · 81

Costa Rica's Gender Parity Electoral Code — 49% Women in Legislature (2009–2026) · 78

San José's AI Road Safety Conditions Pilot — 97% Accurate Pothole Detection from City Vehicle Cameras · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more