evidoria

What works in Dominica

All catalogues

5
evaluated practices
41/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Dominica

Dominica has invested in digital transformation through the Caribbean Digital Transformation Project (CARDTP), which deployed $28M to build shared government cloud infrastructure, a digital ID system, and an e-Services Portal offering 90+ government services, with 12 digital government functions now live on the shared services platform. The country established a National Policy on Gender Equality in 2007, becoming the first English-speaking Caribbean nation to do so, though independently verified outcome data on its impact remains absent. Dominica's Citizenship by Investment Programme generated an estimated 33% of GDP in 2022, funding major infrastructure projects, though the IMF has flagged this revenue stream as volatile and subject to anti-money-laundering scrutiny. Education in Dominica is affected by regional changes: the Caribbean Examinations Council will permit generative AI in school assessments from 2026 and phase out traditional coursework-based assessment in favor of supervised examination formats.

Drawn from: Caribbean Digital Transformation Project (CARDTP) — Dominica · Dominica's National Policy on Gender Equality · The Caribbean Exam Board's 2026 AI U-Turn Reaches Dominica — CXC Permits, Then Redesigns, Assessment Around Generative AI · Dominica's Citizenship by Investment Programme — Fast Revenue Growth, IMF-Flagged Fiscal Risk · Leveraging Eco-Tourism for Biodiversity Protection — GEF-Financed National Park Management (Dominica)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Transferability / replicability -10 pts 50 here · 60 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Scalability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Innovation level -33 pts 30 here · 63 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -42 pts 33 here · 76 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes -85 pts 0 here · 85 average

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 48
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Transferability / replicability
50 · 60
Sustainability (ongoing)
67 · 78
Scalability
50 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 50
Equity & inclusion
33 · 52
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Innovation level
30 · 63
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
33 · 76
Efficiency
0 · 44
Evaluation evidence
0 · 45
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 85

Coloured bar: Dominica. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Caribbean Digital Transformation Project (CARDTP) — Dominica · 52

Dominica's National Policy on Gender Equality · 48

The Caribbean Exam Board's 2026 AI U-Turn Reaches Dominica — CXC Permits, Then Redesigns, Assessment Around Generative AI · 40

Dominica's Citizenship by Investment Programme — Fast Revenue Growth, IMF-Flagged Fiscal Risk · 33

Leveraging Eco-Tourism for Biodiversity Protection — GEF-Financed National Park Management (Dominica) · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Dominica concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more