evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Leveraging Eco-Tourism for Biodiversity Protection — GEF-Financed National Park Management (Dominica)

Dominica · Roseau · See the Dominica profile · See the Roseau profile

Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A US$3.65M GEF/World Bank grant (Project P170846) funds Dominica to rehabilitate trails in three national parks — Cabrits, Morne Trois Pitons (UNESCO) and Morne Diablotin — plus the Waitukubuli Trail, channelling ecotourism revenue into biodiversity management.

Leveraging Eco-Tourism for Biodiversity Protection — GEF-Financed National Park Management (Dominica)

Details

Promoter
Government of the Commonwealth of Dominica – Forestry, Wildlife & Parks Division, with the Global Environment Facility / World Bank
Period
2020s–ongoing
Keywords
biodiversity protection, ecotourism, forest management

Description

Dominica, the Eastern Caribbean's most forested island, has over 60% forest cover, but Hurricane Maria destroyed an estimated 85% of that cover in September 2017. In 2022 the government adopted its first National Forest Policy since 1949, and — supported by the multi-donor PROGREEN partnership (World Bank, Germany, Sweden, UK) — has been aligning forest and protected-area policy with financing to fund recovery.

Within that push, the GEF-financed "Leveraging Eco-Tourism for Biodiversity Protection in Dominica" project (World Bank Project ID P170846, roughly US$3.65 million) targets three national parks — Cabrits National Park, Morne Trois Pitons National Park (a UNESCO World Heritage Site) and Morne Diablotin National Park — plus the Waitukubuli National Trail. The project rehabilitates ecotourism infrastructure and trails, trains local guides, and introduces e-ticketing so visitor revenue can be captured and reinvested in park and biodiversity management; the wider protected-area effort now covers close to a fifth of Dominica's land, including Kalinago Territory, with local skills training and job-access components.

As of the most recent public reporting (2024), the project remained in implementation; quantified biodiversity-trend data (species counts, habitat-condition indices) and ticketing-revenue figures had not yet been published, so this practice is evidenced on programme design, funding and institutional commitment rather than measured ecological outcomes to date.

Read the full analysis: https://gefbiodiversity.agriculture.gov.dm/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful