evidoria

What works in Marshall Islands

All catalogues

3
evaluated practices
49/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 2 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Marshall Islands

The Marshall Islands, a remote Pacific atoll nation of approximately 40,000 residents spread across 24 atolls, is implementing multiple development and protection initiatives. Digital RMI is investing US$37.5 million to build climate-resilient internet and digital-government infrastructure prioritising e-health and e-education, though quantified adoption outcomes remain unpublished during its ongoing seven-year implementation (2021-2028). Weto in Mour operates the nation's first dedicated gender-based-violence support centre, with current intake of 2-3 clients monthly representing only a fraction of estimated need, given that roughly one in three Marshallese women are estimated to experience abuse in their lifetime. Reimaanlok Community-Led Marine Protection designated a 48,000 km² fully protected marine sanctuary around Bikar and Bokak atolls in January 2025, based on surveys documenting the region's highest recorded coral cover and reef-fish biomass, though socio-economic outcome data has not yet been published.

Drawn from: Digital RMI — National Connectivity, Digital Government and Skills Programme · Weto in Mour — Marshall Islands Gender-Based Violence Support Service · Reimaanlok Community-Led Marine Protection — Bikar & Bokak Atolls Sanctuary (Marshall Islands)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Governance, certification & transferability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Sustainability +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Innovation level +17 pts 80 here · 63 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -50 pts 0 here · 50 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality -80 pts 0 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes -85 pts 0 here · 85 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 51
Governance, certification & transferability
100 · 64
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Sustainability
100 · 78
Innovation level
80 · 63
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Efficiency
0 · 44
Evaluation evidence
0 · 45
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 50
Documented learning
0 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Impact on gender equality
0 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 85

Coloured bar: Marshall Islands. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital RMI — National Connectivity, Digital Government and Skills Programme · 56

Weto in Mour — Marshall Islands Gender-Based Violence Support Service · 52

Reimaanlok Community-Led Marine Protection — Bikar & Bokak Atolls Sanctuary (Marshall Islands) · 40

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more