evidoria

What works in Marshall Islands

All catalogues

5
evaluated practices
48/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Marshall Islands

The Marshall Islands is a remote Pacific atoll nation of approximately 40,000 residents spread across 24 climate-vulnerable atolls, with a further roughly 30,000 Marshallese living abroad. The country is advancing maritime surveillance and fisheries enforcement through AI-powered vessel tracking that has blocked illegal tuna landings worth millions of dollars, while simultaneously investing US$37.5 million in climate-resilient digital infrastructure and digital-government systems to improve connectivity across its dispersed atolls. The nation is also addressing gender-based violence through its first dedicated support centre, though current intake of 2–3 monthly clients represents only a fraction of estimated need, and advancing marine conservation via community-led sanctuary designation protecting high coral-cover and reef-fish biomass regions.

Drawn from: MIMRA's Starboard AI Maritime Surveillance Unmasks the Sun Flower 7 — Marshall Islands Blocks a $7.4M Illegal Tuna Landing · Digital RMI — National Connectivity, Digital Government and Skills Programme · Weto in Mour — Marshall Islands Gender-Based Violence Support Service · Reimaanlok Community-Led Marine Protection — Bikar & Bokak Atolls Sanctuary (Marshall Islands) · University of the South Pacific's Regional AI Policy Reaches a Marshall Islands Campus That Has Graduated 358 Foundation Students Since 1996

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transferability / replicability +23 pts 83 here · 60 average

Sustainability +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Governance, certification & transferability +20 pts 83 here · 64 average

Innovation level +18 pts 80 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Scalability beyond pilot -12 pts 50 here · 62 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -38 pts 0 here · 38 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Curator validation
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transferability / replicability
83 · 60
Sustainability
100 · 78
Governance, certification & transferability
83 · 64
Innovation level
80 · 62
Equity & inclusion
67 · 50
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Scalability beyond pilot
50 · 62
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Efficiency
0 · 32
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 38
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Documented learning
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Marshall Islands. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

MIMRA's Starboard AI Maritime Surveillance Unmasks the Sun Flower 7 — Marshall Islands Blocks a $7.4M Illegal Tuna Landing · 67

Digital RMI — National Connectivity, Digital Government and Skills Programme · 56

Weto in Mour — Marshall Islands Gender-Based Violence Support Service · 52

Reimaanlok Community-Led Marine Protection — Bikar & Bokak Atolls Sanctuary (Marshall Islands) · 40

University of the South Pacific's Regional AI Policy Reaches a Marshall Islands Campus That Has Graduated 358 Foundation Students Since 1996 · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Marshall Islands concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more