Top 32%
in this catalogue (1041 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Evidence of impact / measured public value2/3
A single concrete, independently reported enforcement outcome (blocked ~$7.4M landing, ~$150,000 fine) is documented, but no systematic accuracy evaluation across MIMRA's wider surveillance workload has been published.
Transparency, fairness & accountability1/3
MIMRA and Starboard publicise the case's existence and outcome, but the platform's detection algorithms, alert criteria and false-positive rate are not disclosed.
Transferability / demonstrated replication3/3
The same Starboard platform is already used by multiple other Pacific fisheries authorities in FFA-coordinated surveillance, demonstrating real cross-country replication.
Scalability beyond pilot2/3
The tool has been MIMRA's routine national surveillance system since 2022, feeding into a wider regional network, though deployment remains bounded to a single small agency.
Governance, capability & sustainability2/3
MIMRA is an established statutory fisheries authority with sustained external funding (NZ MFAT) for the underlying advisory capability, though no independent audit body oversees the AI tool specifically.
Evidoria. MIMRA's Starboard AI Maritime Surveillance Unmasks the Sun Flower 7 — Marshall Islands Blocks a $7.4M Illegal Tuna Landing. Persistent ID: 165ed278-3c46-4c41-9909-70eea51c434f.