evidoria

What works in Pakistan

All catalogues

24
evaluated practices
59/100
average quality score
15%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed
1
adoptions elsewhere

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Pakistan

Pakistan's evidence base demonstrates impact across social protection, digital inclusion, and infrastructure. BISP's targeted cash transfers to 6.1 million female household heads across 149 districts reduced poverty by 7 percentage points, while Ehsaas Emergency Cash used biometric payments to reach approximately 15 million households during COVID-19, directing 54% of payments directly to women. DigiSkills trained over 800,000 women in digital skills, with graduates generating $1.65 billion in freelancing export revenues, and the Orangi Pilot Project enabled over one million residents to build self-financed sewerage at roughly one-fifth of municipal contractor costs. These practices show scalable models for poverty reduction, women's economic empowerment, and community-led infrastructure, though the evidence presented is primarily observational or descriptive rather than from rigorous experimental evaluation.

Drawn from: Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) — Targeted Cash Transfer to Female Heads of Household · DeafTawk — Deaf-Founded Sign-Language Interpretation Platform in Pakistan · Ehsaas Emergency Cash — Biometric Cashpoints Removing the PIN Barrier for Low-Literacy Women in Pakistan · DigiSkills – National Free Online Digital Skills Training Programme · Orangi Pilot Project — Community-Financed Sewerage for a Karachi Squatter Settlement · Lahore's IoT-and-AI Waste Route Optimisation — 32% Route Efficiency Gain Across 10 Pilot Sites · JudgeGPT — a Nationwide Randomized Trial of Generative AI for Pakistan's Trial-Court Judges · Delta Blue Carbon — Indus Delta Mangrove Restoration (Pakistan)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Transferability / replicability +13 pts 73 here · 59 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +11 pts 42 here · 31 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -21 pts 17 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -25 pts 22 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Transferability / replicability
73 · 59
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
42 · 31
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
58 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
71 · 64
Sustainability (ongoing)
85 · 78
Equity & inclusion
56 · 52
Transparency, fairness & accountability
53 · 54
Governance, certification & transferability
63 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
40 · 42
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Innovation level
56 · 63
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
17 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
22 · 48

Coloured bar: Pakistan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Benazir Income Support Programme (BISP) — Targeted Cash Transfer to Female Heads of Household · 96

DeafTawk — Deaf-Founded Sign-Language Interpretation Platform in Pakistan · 96

Ehsaas Emergency Cash — Biometric Cashpoints Removing the PIN Barrier for Low-Literacy Women in Pakistan · 92

DigiSkills – National Free Online Digital Skills Training Programme · 88

Orangi Pilot Project — Community-Financed Sewerage for a Karachi Squatter Settlement · 86

Lahore's IoT-and-AI Waste Route Optimisation — 32% Route Efficiency Gain Across 10 Pilot Sites · 80

JudgeGPT — a Nationwide Randomized Trial of Generative AI for Pakistan's Trial-Court Judges · 80

Delta Blue Carbon — Indus Delta Mangrove Restoration (Pakistan) · 80

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Pakistan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ushahidi — Kenya's Crowdsourced Crisis-Mapping Platform · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more