evidoria

What works in Sudan

All catalogues

5
evaluated practices
72/100
average quality score
50%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sudan

Drawn from: Can't Wait to Learn: Digital Game-Based Learning for Out-of-School Children in Sudan · Can't Wait to Learn — adaptive tablet game for out-of-school children in Sudan · HungerMap LIVE's AI Nowcasting Tracks Sudan's Slide Toward Famine · MANSAM-SORD Women's Political Candidate Identification & Training Initiative · GAMS — Gums for Adaptation and Mitigation in Sudan

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Evidence of learning impact +39 pts 67 here · 28 average

Scalability & sustainability +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +36 pts 67 here · 31 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Transferability / replicability +24 pts 83 here · 59 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Innovation level +17 pts 80 here · 63 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 48
Equity & inclusion
100 · 52
Evidence of learning impact
67 · 28
Scalability & sustainability
100 · 64
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 31
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Transferability / replicability
83 · 59
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Innovation level
80 · 63
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Sustainability (ongoing)
50 · 78
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Sudan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Can't Wait to Learn: Digital Game-Based Learning for Out-of-School Children in Sudan · 96

Can't Wait to Learn — adaptive tablet game for out-of-school children in Sudan · 80

HungerMap LIVE's AI Nowcasting Tracks Sudan's Slide Toward Famine · 73

MANSAM-SORD Women's Political Candidate Identification & Training Initiative · 63

GAMS — Gums for Adaptation and Mitigation in Sudan · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more