evidoria

What works in Sudan

All catalogues

6
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
33%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sudan

Drawn from: Can't Wait to Learn: Digital Game-Based Learning for Out-of-School Children in Sudan · Can't Wait to Learn — adaptive tablet game for out-of-school children in Sudan · HungerMap LIVE's AI Nowcasting Tracks Sudan's Slide Toward Famine · MANSAM-SORD Women's Political Candidate Identification & Training Initiative · GAMS — Gums for Adaptation and Mitigation in Sudan · 249Startups — Sudan's Leading Tech Accelerator and Its Collapse Under Civil War

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +68 pts 100 here · 32 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +53 pts 100 here · 47 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Evidence of learning impact +40 pts 67 here · 26 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +40 pts 67 here · 27 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Scalability & sustainability +16 pts 78 here · 62 average

Innovation level +12 pts 73 here · 62 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +10 pts 67 here · 57 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Sustainability (ongoing) -45 pts 33 here · 78 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 32
Transparency, ethics & data protection
100 · 47
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Equity & inclusion
100 · 50
Evidence of learning impact
67 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 27
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 48
Scalability & sustainability
78 · 62
Innovation level
73 · 62
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 57
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Sustainability (ongoing)
33 · 78
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Achievement / evidence
0 · 87

Coloured bar: Sudan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Can't Wait to Learn: Digital Game-Based Learning for Out-of-School Children in Sudan · 96

Can't Wait to Learn — adaptive tablet game for out-of-school children in Sudan · 80

HungerMap LIVE's AI Nowcasting Tracks Sudan's Slide Toward Famine · 73

MANSAM-SORD Women's Political Candidate Identification & Training Initiative · 63

GAMS — Gums for Adaptation and Mitigation in Sudan · 47

249Startups — Sudan's Leading Tech Accelerator and Its Collapse Under Civil War · 43

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more