evidoria

What works in South Sudan

All catalogues

6
evaluated practices
46/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for South Sudan

Drawn from: Instant Network Schools — Offline Adaptive Classrooms for Refugee Students in Ajuong Thok, South Sudan · MTN Y'ello Care Digital Inclusion Hubs (Mangateen & Gorom) · Job Creation through Youth and Women-led Micro and Small Enterprises (JMSE) — South Sudan · Boma–Badingilo Migratory Landscape — Africa's Largest Land-Mammal Migration Under New Park Management · IOM–WFP Biometric Data-Sharing Deduplicates Aid Registries in South Sudan · Dignity Kits for Menstrual Hygiene Management — UNICEF/UMCOR Response in Aweil, South Sudan

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +57 pts 100 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Governance, certification & transferability -14 pts 50 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 44 here · 60 average

Scalability & sustainability -18 pts 44 here · 62 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Sustainability -34 pts 44 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured results -40 pts 17 here · 57 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
100 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Equity & inclusion
100 · 50
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 27
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Governance, certification & transferability
50 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Innovation level
47 · 62
Transferability / replicability
44 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
44 · 62
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 32
Sustainability
44 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured results
17 · 57
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Curator validation
0 · 73
Documented learning
0 · 74
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: South Sudan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Instant Network Schools — Offline Adaptive Classrooms for Refugee Students in Ajuong Thok, South Sudan · 53

MTN Y'ello Care Digital Inclusion Hubs (Mangateen & Gorom) · 52

Job Creation through Youth and Women-led Micro and Small Enterprises (JMSE) — South Sudan · 48

Boma–Badingilo Migratory Landscape — Africa's Largest Land-Mammal Migration Under New Park Management · 47

IOM–WFP Biometric Data-Sharing Deduplicates Aid Registries in South Sudan · 40

Dignity Kits for Menstrual Hygiene Management — UNICEF/UMCOR Response in Aweil, South Sudan · 37

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in South Sudan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more