evidoria

What works in Chad

All catalogues

7
evaluated practices
43/100
average quality score
20%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Chad

Drawn from: Can't Wait to Learn — Closing the Numeracy Gender Gap for Refugee Children in Eastern Chad · SWEDD: Sahel Women's Empowerment and Demographic Dividend Project — Chad · Human-Verified AI for Curriculum Writing — Chad's National Curriculum Centre Trains 60 Designers · PROLAC — Lake Chad Basin Recovery and Development Project · Greater Zakouma Ecosystem — Government–NGO Performance-Based Conservation Financing (Chad) · Connectivity for Refugees: Connected Centres in Eastern Chad · Chad's Free National AI Training Programme for 2,000 Young Citizens

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Equity & inclusion +26 pts 78 here · 52 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -15 pts 22 here · 37 average

Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Evaluation evidence -45 pts 0 here · 45 average

Curator validation -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 74
Equity & inclusion
78 · 52
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 64
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Innovation level
60 · 63
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 37
Sustainability
50 · 78
Efficiency
0 · 44
Evaluation evidence
0 · 45
Curator validation
0 · 74
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Chad. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Can't Wait to Learn — Closing the Numeracy Gender Gap for Refugee Children in Eastern Chad · 60

SWEDD: Sahel Women's Empowerment and Demographic Dividend Project — Chad · 52

Human-Verified AI for Curriculum Writing — Chad's National Curriculum Centre Trains 60 Designers · 47

PROLAC — Lake Chad Basin Recovery and Development Project · 40

Greater Zakouma Ecosystem — Government–NGO Performance-Based Conservation Financing (Chad) · 40

Connectivity for Refugees: Connected Centres in Eastern Chad · 32

Chad's Free National AI Training Programme for 2,000 Young Citizens · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Chad concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more