evidoria

What works in Chad

All catalogues

9
evaluated practices
45/100
average quality score
11%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Chad

Drawn from: Can't Wait to Learn — Closing the Numeracy Gender Gap for Refugee Children in Eastern Chad · IFC–FMO–Coris Bank SME Credit Line — A $10 Million Bet on Chadian Small Business Lending · SWEDD: Sahel Women's Empowerment and Demographic Dividend Project — Chad · SIGPTS — Chad Extends AI Biometric Deduplication to National Refugee IDs · Human-Verified AI for Curriculum Writing — Chad's National Curriculum Centre Trains 60 Designers · PROLAC — Lake Chad Basin Recovery and Development Project · Greater Zakouma Ecosystem — Government–NGO Performance-Based Conservation Financing (Chad) · Connectivity for Refugees: Connected Centres in Eastern Chad

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Equity & inclusion +28 pts 78 here · 50 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +19 pts 67 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -10 pts 17 here · 27 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -16 pts 22 here · 38 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Sustainability -22 pts 56 here · 78 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Evaluation evidence -49 pts 0 here · 49 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Curator validation -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -76 pts 0 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Equity & inclusion
78 · 50
Documented learning
100 · 74
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 64
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 48
Scalability & sustainability
60 · 62
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 26
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 27
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Innovation level
47 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 38
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Sustainability
56 · 78
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Efficiency
0 · 32
Evaluation evidence
0 · 49
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Curator validation
0 · 73
Demonstrated reach
0 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Chad. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Can't Wait to Learn — Closing the Numeracy Gender Gap for Refugee Children in Eastern Chad · 60

IFC–FMO–Coris Bank SME Credit Line — A $10 Million Bet on Chadian Small Business Lending · 57

SWEDD: Sahel Women's Empowerment and Demographic Dividend Project — Chad · 52

SIGPTS — Chad Extends AI Biometric Deduplication to National Refugee IDs · 47

Human-Verified AI for Curriculum Writing — Chad's National Curriculum Centre Trains 60 Designers · 47

PROLAC — Lake Chad Basin Recovery and Development Project · 40

Greater Zakouma Ecosystem — Government–NGO Performance-Based Conservation Financing (Chad) · 40

Connectivity for Refugees: Connected Centres in Eastern Chad · 32

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Chad concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more