evidoria

What works in Taiwan

All catalogues

23
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
10%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Taiwan

Drawn from: Digital Opportunity Centers (DOC) — Taiwan's Rural & Indigenous Digital Inclusion Network · vTaiwan — Taiwan's AI-assisted public deliberation platform for policy-making · Taiwan's Reserved-Seat Gender Quota for Local Councils · Taipei Smart City Project Management Office (TPMO) · Taiwan Adaptive Learning Platform (TALP) — AI-assisted teaching and adaptive K-12 learning · ITRI — Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute · Taiwan's Act of Gender Equality in Employment (性別工作平等法) — Comprehensive Workplace Rights and Equal Pay (2002, amended 2021) · Eye-Gaze Assistive Technology for Students with Severe Motor and Communication Difficulties — Chang Gung University's Taiwan Feasibility Studies

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evidence of learning impact +32 pts 60 here · 28 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +23 pts 60 here · 37 average

Equity & inclusion +21 pts 73 here · 52 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +20 pts 73 here · 54 average

Sustainability +19 pts 97 here · 78 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Innovation +14 pts 77 here · 63 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +12 pts 60 here · 48 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +11 pts 70 here · 59 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Evaluation evidence -12 pts 33 here · 45 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 31 average

Inclusiveness / equity -20 pts 22 here · 42 average

Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evidence of learning impact
60 · 28
Documented learning
100 · 74
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Teacher capability & pedagogy
60 · 37
Equity & inclusion
73 · 52
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Transparency, fairness & accountability
73 · 54
Sustainability
97 · 78
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Innovation
77 · 63
Transparency, ethics & data protection
60 · 48
Evidence of impact / measured public value
70 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Scalability beyond pilot
69 · 64
Transferability / demonstrated replication
64 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 76
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 50
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Evaluation evidence
33 · 45
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 31
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 42
Effectiveness
50 · 77
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Taiwan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Digital Opportunity Centers (DOC) — Taiwan's Rural & Indigenous Digital Inclusion Network · 92

vTaiwan — Taiwan's AI-assisted public deliberation platform for policy-making · 87

Taiwan's Reserved-Seat Gender Quota for Local Councils · 82

Taipei Smart City Project Management Office (TPMO) · 81

Taiwan Adaptive Learning Platform (TALP) — AI-assisted teaching and adaptive K-12 learning · 80

ITRI — Taiwan's Industrial Technology Research Institute · 76

Taiwan's Act of Gender Equality in Employment (性別工作平等法) — Comprehensive Workplace Rights and Equal Pay (2002, amended 2021) · 74

Eye-Gaze Assistive Technology for Students with Severe Motor and Communication Difficulties — Chang Gung University's Taiwan Feasibility Studies · 73

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Taiwan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more