evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Presidential Hackathon — Taiwan's Annual Bridge from Civic Hackathon to Government Policy

Taiwan · Taipei · See the Taiwan profile · See the Taipei profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 17% 81/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Taiwan's annual Presidential Hackathon pairs citizen and civil-servant teams to solve public problems with data, then embeds winning prototypes into agency operations. The 2023 edition drew 60+ international proposals; the winning 'Water Saviours' tool was invited to New Zealand.

60+
International Track proposals (2023)
~70%
'Water Saviours' leak-detection accuracy
Presidential Hackathon — Taiwan's Annual Bridge from Civic Hackathon to Government Policy

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Public Digital Innovation Space (PDIS), Ministry of Digital Affairs
Period
2018–present
Keywords
civic tech, digital government, open data, hackathon

Context

Taiwan's Presidential Hackathon began in 2018 under the Public Digital Innovation Space (PDIS), the civic-tech unit now part of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, building on the earlier vTaiwan and g0v civic-tech movements.

Objectives

Mixed teams of citizens, technologists and civil servants pitch data-driven solutions to public problems, with PDIS aiming to embed winning prototypes directly into government agency operations rather than simply award prize money.

Activities

PDIS assigns dedicated support staff to help winning teams carry their prototypes into real agency operations; the International Track invites overseas teams to compete alongside domestic ones.

Results

The 2023 International Track drew a record 60+ overseas proposals; the flagship 'Water Saviours' tool used machine learning to detect leaking water pipes with roughly 70% accuracy, and New Zealand's government invited the team to co-develop a similar tool for its own water utilities.

Conclusions

Official communications highlight individual award-winning projects and rising participation, but no independently audited, programme-wide evaluation of policy impact or cost-effectiveness has been published, so the evidence base rests on selected flagship cases rather than a systematic outcome study.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
PDIS/Ministry of Digital Affairs civic-tech staff, citizen technologist teams, civil servant teams

Conditions for success

  • dedicated post-hackathon support staff to embed winning prototypes into actual agency operations
  • mixed citizen and civil-servant team composition
  • continuous annual cadence since 2018 building institutional credibility

Common failure modes

  • no independently audited, programme-wide evaluation of policy impact or cost-effectiveness across all cohorts
  • public evidence rests on selected flagship cases rather than a systematic outcome study

Where it fits

Governance type
national digital-government unit
Scale
national with international track
Income level
high-income (Taiwan)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful