Taiwan's annual Presidential Hackathon pairs citizen and civil-servant teams to solve public problems with data, then embeds winning prototypes into agency operations. The 2023 edition drew 60+ international proposals; the winning 'Water Saviours' tool was invited to New Zealand.
60+
International Track proposals (2023)
~70%
'Water Saviours' leak-detection accuracy
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
Public Digital Innovation Space (PDIS), Ministry of Digital Affairs
Period
2018–present
Keywords
civic tech, digital government, open data, hackathon
Context
Taiwan's Presidential Hackathon began in 2018 under the Public Digital Innovation Space (PDIS), the civic-tech unit now part of the Ministry of Digital Affairs, building on the earlier vTaiwan and g0v civic-tech movements.
Objectives
Mixed teams of citizens, technologists and civil servants pitch data-driven solutions to public problems, with PDIS aiming to embed winning prototypes directly into government agency operations rather than simply award prize money.
Activities
PDIS assigns dedicated support staff to help winning teams carry their prototypes into real agency operations; the International Track invites overseas teams to compete alongside domestic ones.
Results
The 2023 International Track drew a record 60+ overseas proposals; the flagship 'Water Saviours' tool used machine learning to detect leaking water pipes with roughly 70% accuracy, and New Zealand's government invited the team to co-develop a similar tool for its own water utilities.
Conclusions
Official communications highlight individual award-winning projects and rising participation, but no independently audited, programme-wide evaluation of policy impact or cost-effectiveness has been published, so the evidence base rests on selected flagship cases rather than a systematic outcome study.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
PDIS/Ministry of Digital Affairs civic-tech staff, citizen technologist teams, civil servant teams
Conditions for success
dedicated post-hackathon support staff to embed winning prototypes into actual agency operations
mixed citizen and civil-servant team composition
continuous annual cadence since 2018 building institutional credibility
Common failure modes
no independently audited, programme-wide evaluation of policy impact or cost-effectiveness across all cohorts
public evidence rests on selected flagship cases rather than a systematic outcome study
Where it fits
Governance type
national digital-government unit
Scale
national with international track
Income level
high-income (Taiwan)
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Ukraine's ProZorro platform, co-built from 2014 by volunteer technologists, government and donors, cut single-supplier contracting from 11% to 5% within …