evidoria

What works in Yemen

All catalogues

6
evaluated practices
41/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 5 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Yemen

Yemen's evidence base demonstrates intervention outcomes across digital literacy, SME job support, conservation, and emergency cash work, though with significant limitations. Digital literacy training for 50 displaced women showed near four-fold self-reported knowledge gains, while BRAVE's SME programme sustained over 15,000 jobs and created ~1,000 more during active civil war. The Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan has protected 426 km² and 825 plant species through ongoing conflict since 2000, and the World Bank's cash-for-work project engaged roughly 423,000 conflict-affected people, including ~96,000 women, since 2016. These practices are descriptive and self-reported, originating from implementing organizations; the studies do not establish lasting economic empowerment or long-term sustainability, and power cuts, device access, and conflict constraints are documented limitations.

Drawn from: Safe Space to Learn: Digital Literacy for Displaced Women · BRAVE — Sustaining SME Jobs Through Yemen's Civil War · Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan — Community-Based Protection for a UNESCO World Heritage Archipelago · Yemen Emergency Crisis Response Project: Women in Crisis Cash-for-Work · Yemen's Social Fund Pilots In-House AI to Police a 9.6-Million-Person Cash Programme · Grassroots ChatGPT Adoption in Yemen's Universities — A 277-Student Engineering Survey Amid Conflict-Era Resource Scarcity

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +52 pts 100 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity +24 pts 67 here · 43 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Innovation level -15 pts 47 here · 62 average

Equity & inclusion -16 pts 33 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -24 pts 33 here · 57 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -27 pts 0 here · 27 average

Scalability & sustainability -29 pts 33 here · 62 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Transferability / replicability -38 pts 22 here · 60 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -38 pts 0 here · 38 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Sustainability -67 pts 11 here · 78 average

Impact on gender equality -70 pts 0 here · 70 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 48
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
67 · 43
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Innovation level
47 · 62
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 57
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 27
Scalability & sustainability
33 · 62
Efficiency
0 · 32
Transferability / replicability
22 · 60
Teacher capability & pedagogy
0 · 38
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 48
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Sustainability
11 · 78
Impact on gender equality
0 · 70
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Yemen. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Safe Space to Learn: Digital Literacy for Displaced Women · 72

BRAVE — Sustaining SME Jobs Through Yemen's Civil War · 48

Socotra Conservation Zoning Plan — Community-Based Protection for a UNESCO World Heritage Archipelago · 40

Yemen Emergency Crisis Response Project: Women in Crisis Cash-for-Work · 37

Yemen's Social Fund Pilots In-House AI to Police a 9.6-Million-Person Cash Programme · 27

Grassroots ChatGPT Adoption in Yemen's Universities — A 277-Student Engineering Survey Amid Conflict-Era Resource Scarcity · 20

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Yemen concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more