evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

100 Resilient Cities: Rockefeller's City-to-City Resilience Network — and Its Abrupt Wind-Down

United States of America · New York · See the United States of America profile · See the New York profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Rockefeller Foundation's 100 Resilient Cities placed Chief Resilience Officers in 80+ cities from 2013–2019, then closed the programme after six years when funding priorities shifted — a documented cautionary case for donor-dependent city networks.

80+ officers
Chief Resilience Officers hired (2013–2019)
~80 cities
Cities producing resilience strategies (by 2019)
8-9 USD million
Transition funding committed to successor network (2019)
100 Resilient Cities: Rockefeller's City-to-City Resilience Network — and Its Abrupt Wind-Down

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
The Rockefeller Foundation / 100 Resilient Cities
Period
2013–2019 (successor Global Resilient Cities Network, 2019–present)
Keywords
urban resilience, disaster risk reduction, municipal networks, philanthropy

Context

The Rockefeller Foundation launched 100 Resilient Cities (100RC) in 2013, headquartered in New York, to help cities worldwide build resilience to physical, social and economic shocks. Selected cities received funding for a Chief Resilience Officer (CRO) post and support to draft a city-specific resilience strategy, backed by a network of platform partners offering tools and technical assistance.

Activities

An independent midterm evaluation by the Urban Institute, based on a 21-city sample, found the programme had institutionalised resilience thinking: more than 80 Chief Resilience Officers were hired and roughly 80 cities had produced resilience strategies by the time of the shutdown.

Results

On 31 July 2019, the Rockefeller Foundation closed the 100RC organisation after six years, citing internal budget prioritisation rather than programme performance. It committed roughly $8–9 million to help transition surviving Chief Resilience Officer positions and city relationships into a new, independently run successor, the Global Resilient Cities Network — a fraction of 100RC's original funding.

Conclusions

A 2023 peer-reviewed review in the Journal of Environmental Planning and Management concluded the literature shows no strong evidence that 100RC delivered on equity outcomes, and other scholarship criticised its standardised, fast-turnaround methodology as frequently mismatched to individual cities' governance and planning conventions. Included here as a cautionary case: a high-visibility, well-funded knowledge-transfer network can scale to 100 cities in a few years, yet remain financially and institutionally fragile once its founding donor's priorities shift — underscoring the need for diversified, city-anchored funding if such networks are to endure.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — Not fully disclosed; funded CRO salaries, strategy development and platform-partner services in 100+ cities globally over six years, then committed roughly $8–9 million in 2019 to transition surviving relationships to an independently run successor network.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Ran 2013 to July 2019 (6 years) before winding down; successor Global Resilient Cities Network continues from 2019 to present.
Staffing & skills
Funded and run by the Rockefeller Foundation; supported a dedicated Chief Resilience Officer position in each selected city, Backed by a network of platform partners providing tools and technical assistance

Conditions for success

  • Dedicated CRO funding and staff embedded within city government to drive the resilience strategy
  • A network of platform partners for tools and technical assistance

Common failure modes

  • Closed after six years when the founding donor's internal budget priorities shifted, despite no stated performance problem — illustrating the financial and institutional fragility of donor-dependent city networks
  • 2023 peer-reviewed review found no strong evidence the programme delivered on equity outcomes
  • Standardised, fast-turnaround methodology criticised as frequently mismatched to individual cities' governance and planning conventions
  • Transition funding to the successor network (roughly $8–9 million) was a fraction of 100RC's original funding

Where it fits

Governance type
philanthropic foundation-led global city network
Scale
global (100+ cities)
Income level
high income

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful