evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

AI Risk Screening for Customs — Tunisia's National Selectivity System Targets Fraud

Tunisia · Tunis · See the Tunisia profile · See the Tunis profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 76% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In May 2026 Tunisia's Customs Authority added a machine-learning module to its selectivity system to flag high-risk shipments by origin, value and importer history. Widely reported Q1 2026 seizure figures predate the launch, so the module's own effect isn't yet isolated.

~4,000 cases
Enforcement cases (predates AI module approval) (Q1 2026)
51 million TND (~US$17.6M)
Value of seized goods (predates AI module approval) (Q1 2026)
AI Risk Screening for Customs — Tunisia's National Selectivity System Targets Fraud

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Direction Générale des Douanes (Tunisian Customs Authority)
Period
2026–ongoing
Keywords
customs, trade facilitation, fraud detection, public finance

Context

On 16 May 2026, Tunisia's Central Committee for Judicial Risk Action, under the Direction Générale des Douanes (Customs Authority), approved integrating a machine-learning module into the national 'Système de Sélectivité' used to screen import and export declarations.

Objectives

Score incoming shipments by analysing the nature of goods, country of origin, declared value, import history and the profile of the economic operator, to flag high-risk consignments for physical inspection while letting low-risk, compliant trade clear faster.

Activities

The module was integrated directly into the existing national selectivity system covering all customs points, alongside two related 2026 initiatives: 'Sinda 2', a next-generation platform connecting government agencies on customs data, and a joint project with South Korea to digitise customs procedures.

Results

Tunisian customs reported nearly 4,000 enforcement cases and over 51 million dinars (about $17.6 million) in seized goods for Q1 2026 — but that reporting period ends before the AI module's May 2026 approval, so these figures describe general enforcement performance rather than a measured before/after effect of the new algorithm. No public accuracy, false-positive, or inspection-rate figures for the AI module itself have been published.

Conclusions

The deployment reflects a broader institutional push into digitised, data-driven customs enforcement, but the AI module's own effect on detection accuracy or trade flow has not yet been independently measured or disclosed.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No public cost figures disclosed for the machine-learning module itself; integrated into an existing national system alongside the Sinda 2 platform — conservative medium estimate pending curator review.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Approved 16 May 2026 and already integrated nationally; too recent (as of this record) for a measured rollout timeline — conservative medium estimate pending curator review.
Staffing & skills
Direction Générale des Douanes (Tunisian Customs Authority), Central Committee for Judicial Risk Action

Conditions for success

  • Built directly into the existing national 'Système de Sélectivité' rather than as a standalone pilot
  • Paired with the 'Sinda 2' interoperability platform connecting government agencies on customs data
  • International cooperation with South Korea to digitise customs procedures

Common failure modes

  • No public accuracy, false-positive, or inspection-rate figures for the AI module itself
  • No published technical documentation, audit process or appeal mechanism

Where it fits

Governance type
national customs authority
Scale
national (all customs points)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful