evidoria

What works in Tunisia

All catalogues

23
evaluated practices
50/100
average quality score
11%
strong evidence, of 18 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Tunisia

Tunisia has pursued multi-sector development reforms with documented results across urban infrastructure, startup innovation, and rural connectivity. PRIQH rehabilitated 155 low-income neighbourhoods reaching 865,000 residents through a 617-million-dinar programme between 2012 and 2024, while Tunisia's Startup Act created 4,500 jobs and TND 240 million in cumulative revenue by end-2021, with labelled startups growing to 1,043 by 2024. A rural broadband project connected 94 white-zone sectors across 15 governorates to 4G, reaching approximately 180,000 people, 164 schools and 59 health centres. However, evidence on sustained outcomes is limited — post-project evaluations for the broadband initiative are unavailable, and startup growth remains heavily concentrated in Tunis (70%) with minimal female founder participation (5%).

Drawn from: PRIQH — Tunisia's National Programme to Rehabilitate Popular Neighbourhoods · Tunisia's Startup Act — A Dedicated Legal Status Cutting Red Tape for Innovative Firms · Startup Act & Smart Capital — Tunisia's National Startup-Labelling Law · Zones Blanches – National White Zones Broadband Coverage Project · Novation City — Sousse's NVIDIA-Backed AI Innovation Hub for Africa · Tunisia's Electoral Gender Parity Law — 47% Women in Municipal Government (2011–2022) · Programme de Mise à Niveau (PMN) — Tunisia's Three-Decade Industrial Upgrading Scheme · Tunisia's Oases Ecosystems and Livelihoods Project (GDEO)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +30 pts 78 here · 48 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Evaluation evidence +11 pts 60 here · 49 average

Governance, certification & transferability +10 pts 73 here · 64 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +9 pts 56 here · 47 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Achievement / evidence -12 pts 75 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -14 pts 75 here · 89 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evidence of learning impact -15 pts 11 here · 26 average

Impact on gender equality -20 pts 50 here · 70 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Curator validation -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Sustainability -27 pts 51 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion -27 pts 22 here · 50 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Documented learning -34 pts 40 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach -36 pts 40 here · 76 average

Effectiveness -41 pts 25 here · 66 average

Score profile vs peers

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 48
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Evaluation evidence
60 · 49
Governance, certification & transferability
73 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 47
Scalability
67 · 62
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
78 · 74
Transferability / replicability
64 · 60
Evidence of impact / measured results
54 · 57
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 38
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 27
Innovation level
56 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Achievement / evidence
75 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
75 · 89
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
11 · 26
Impact on gender equality
50 · 70
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Curator validation
50 · 73
Sustainability
51 · 78
Equity & inclusion
22 · 50
Efficiency
0 · 32
Documented learning
40 · 74
Demonstrated reach
40 · 76
Effectiveness
25 · 66

Coloured bar: Tunisia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

PRIQH — Tunisia's National Programme to Rehabilitate Popular Neighbourhoods · 76

Tunisia's Startup Act — A Dedicated Legal Status Cutting Red Tape for Innovative Firms · 71

Startup Act & Smart Capital — Tunisia's National Startup-Labelling Law · 71

Zones Blanches – National White Zones Broadband Coverage Project · 68

Novation City — Sousse's NVIDIA-Backed AI Innovation Hub for Africa · 67

Tunisia's Electoral Gender Parity Law — 47% Women in Municipal Government (2011–2022) · 63

Programme de Mise à Niveau (PMN) — Tunisia's Three-Decade Industrial Upgrading Scheme · 62

Tunisia's Oases Ecosystems and Livelihoods Project (GDEO) · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Tunisia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more