evidoria

What works in Tunisia

All catalogues

17
evaluated practices
52/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 14 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Tunisia

Tunisia has pursued three major infrastructure and economic-development initiatives since 2017. PRIQH rehabilitated 155 low-income neighbourhoods reaching 865,000 residents and 172,000 homes between 2012 and 2024, while the Startup Act created a dedicated legal status that labelled 1,043 startups by 2024, generating 4,500 jobs and enabling labelled startups to raise $782 million in annual funding by 2023. Rural broadband coverage was extended to 94 underserved sectors via the Zones Blanches project, connecting approximately 180,000 inhabitants, 164 schools and 59 health centres by 2022. However, the evidence shows geographic concentration risks—70% of labelled startups remain Tunis-based, and only 5% are women-only founded—and no post-project evaluations are documented for the broadband initiative.

Drawn from: PRIQH — Tunisia's National Programme to Rehabilitate Popular Neighbourhoods · Tunisia's Startup Act — A Dedicated Legal Status Cutting Red Tape for Innovative Firms · Startup Act & Smart Capital — Tunisia's National Startup-Labelling Law · Zones Blanches – National White Zones Broadband Coverage Project · Tunisia's Electoral Gender Parity Law — 47% Women in Municipal Government (2011–2022) · Programme de Mise à Niveau (PMN) — Tunisia's Three-Decade Industrial Upgrading Scheme · Tunisia's Oases Ecosystems and Livelihoods Project (GDEO) · Orange Digital Center Tunisia – Coding School, FabLab & Youth Employment Hub

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Governance, certification & transferability +10 pts 75 here · 64 average

Achievement / evidence +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +8 pts 56 here · 48 average

Weaknesses

Impact on gender equality -13 pts 67 here · 80 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -14 pts 17 here · 30 average

Inclusiveness / equity -16 pts 27 here · 42 average

Evidence of learning impact -17 pts 11 here · 28 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -17 pts 33 here · 51 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -24 pts 67 here · 91 average

Sustainability -28 pts 50 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion -30 pts 22 here · 52 average

Efficiency -43 pts 0 here · 43 average

Effectiveness -43 pts 33 here · 77 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Governance, certification & transferability
75 · 64
Achievement / evidence
100 · 90
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 48
Scalability
70 · 64
Transferability / replicability
60 · 60
Evidence of impact / measured results
57 · 59
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
73 · 75
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 37
Innovation level
57 · 63
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Curator validation
67 · 74
Impact on gender equality
67 · 80
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
17 · 30
Inclusiveness / equity
27 · 42
Evidence of learning impact
11 · 28
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 51
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
67 · 91
Sustainability
50 · 78
Equity & inclusion
22 · 52
Efficiency
0 · 43
Effectiveness
33 · 77
Documented learning
0 · 74

Coloured bar: Tunisia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

PRIQH — Tunisia's National Programme to Rehabilitate Popular Neighbourhoods · 76

Tunisia's Startup Act — A Dedicated Legal Status Cutting Red Tape for Innovative Firms · 71

Startup Act & Smart Capital — Tunisia's National Startup-Labelling Law · 71

Zones Blanches – National White Zones Broadband Coverage Project · 68

Tunisia's Electoral Gender Parity Law — 47% Women in Municipal Government (2011–2022) · 63

Programme de Mise à Niveau (PMN) — Tunisia's Three-Decade Industrial Upgrading Scheme · 62

Tunisia's Oases Ecosystems and Livelihoods Project (GDEO) · 53

Orange Digital Center Tunisia – Coding School, FabLab & Youth Employment Hub · 52

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Tunisia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Step-by-Step — Refugee-Redesigned Digital Mental Health App, Trialled Nationally in Lebanon · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more