evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Arachne+ — The European Commission's Data-Mining Tool for Flagging Fraud and Conflicts of Interest in EU Funds

Belgium · Brussels · See the Belgium profile · See the Brussels profile

Top 12% 80/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The EU's Arachne+ tool mines beneficiary, contract and ownership data — including Moody's Orbis and World Compliance records — to flag fraud and conflict-of-interest risk in EU funds, though several member states still don't use it or run parallel systems.

Arachne+ — The European Commission's Data-Mining Tool for Flagging Fraud and Conflicts of Interest in EU Funds

Details

Promoter
European Commission (Anti-Fraud Knowledge Centre / DG EMPL-REGIO)
Period
2013-2028
Keywords
fraud detection, conflict of interest, public procurement, EU cohesion funds

Description

Arachne is the European Commission's corporate data-mining and risk-scoring tool for detecting fraud, conflicts of interest and other irregularities in EU-funded projects under shared management — chiefly the European Social Fund, European Regional Development Fund and Cohesion Fund. First made available to managing authorities around 2013, it cross-references EU beneficiary and contract data against external sources.
The tool applies dozens of risk indicators — 107 in the legacy system, streamlined to 78 in the current Arachne+ version — to flag higher-risk projects, beneficiaries, contracts and contractors, drawing on operational data supplied by EU institutions and member states (beneficiaries, contractors, contracts, financial flows, beneficial-ownership data) enriched with external commercial data from Moody's Analytics' Orbis (company ownership and financial structures) and World Compliance (sanctions lists, politically exposed persons and adverse media). The European Commission has proposed making its use compulsory across all funds and management modes from 2028, following a planned readiness assessment at the end of 2027.
By September 2019 — several years after roll-out — 20 of the then 28 EU member states used Arachne, with 16 having integrated it into their operational-programme management processes; the most active users included Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, France, Italy, Latvia and Romania. Austria, Germany, Sweden, Finland and Denmark remained non-users or undecided, and Poland opted to build its own national alternative instead — evidence that, years after launch, adoption of the EU's own anti-fraud data-mining tool remained voluntary and uneven across the bloc it was designed to protect.

Read the full analysis: https://eucrim.eu/articles/implementation-effective-measures-against-fraud-and-illegal-activities-cohesion-policies/

Read the full analysis: https://eucrim.eu/articles/implementation-effective-measures-against-fraud-and-illegal-activities-cohesion-policies/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful