evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ASAN Xidmet — One-Stop Digital Public Service Centres

Azerbaijan · Baku · See the Azerbaijan profile · See the Baku profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 23% 92/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Azerbaijan's ASAN Xidmet one-stop-shop centres, launched in 2012 and backed by mobile 'ASAN' buses reaching rural areas, digitised dozens of services and won the 2015 UN Public Service Award, though a 2025 mass-surveillance system reportedly draws on the data they collect.

~20–27
Service centres nationwide
97
Participating institutions (2024)
1st place (Western Asia)
UN Public Service Award (2015)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
State Agency for Public Service and Social Innovations under the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Period
2012-present
Keywords
e-government, one-stop-shop services, public administration, rural outreach

Context

ASAN Xidmet is Azerbaijan's one-stop-shop network of government service centres, created by presidential decrees in 2012 and run by the State Agency for Public Service and Social Innovations, bundling dozens of public and private services under one roof with mobile 'ASAN' buses and a train reaching rural communities.

Results

The network grew to roughly 20–27 centres and has processed tens of millions of applications since 2012; ASAN's 2024 annual report lists 97 participating institutions. It won 1st place (Western Asia) in the 2015 UN Public Service Awards, and independent academic studies describe it as a largely bribery-free 'pocket of integrity' — while noting its success has not reformed the wider bureaucracy and that a 2025 surveillance decree drawing on ASAN data raises governance concerns.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful