evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

ATRS — The UK's Mandatory Public Register of Government Algorithmic Tools

United Kingdom · London · See the United Kingdom profile · See the London profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 80/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The UK's Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard requires central government bodies to publish structured records of algorithmic tools that significantly influence decisions or interact with citizens — growing from a 2021 pilot to 125 records by end-2025.

59
Published ATRS records (May 2025)
125
Published ATRS records (end of 2025)
ATRS — The UK's Mandatory Public Register of Government Algorithmic Tools

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) — Responsible Technology Adoption Unit
Period
2021–present (mandatory since 2025)
Keywords
government, AI governance, transparency, public administration, digital government

Context

The Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard (ATRS) was piloted by the UK Cabinet Office in November 2021, developed with input from the Ada Lovelace Institute and the Open Data Institute after controversies such as the 2020 exam-grading algorithm that downgraded results for disadvantaged students.

Objectives

Each ATRS record documents an algorithmic tool's purpose, the data it uses, its oversight arrangements and its risk tier, published in a standardised public template, so that citizens and researchers can see which algorithmic tools government bodies use and how they are governed.

Activities

In 2025, ATRS reporting became mandatory for UK central government departments and their arm's-length bodies, with a commitment to publish records for every identified in-scope tool by the end of the year.

Results

Published records grew from a handful in the 2021-22 pilot to 59 by May 2025 and 125 by the end of 2025, according to the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology and OECD.AI reporting.

Conclusions

Coverage still stops short of full government: local authorities and devolved administrations participate voluntarily rather than under mandate, and researchers have noted that the depth and quality of individual records vary by department, with publication sometimes lagging behind a tool's actual deployment.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
DSIT Responsible Technology Adoption Unit, departmental teams completing individual ATRS records

Conditions for success

  • A standardised public template covering purpose, data, oversight and risk tier
  • A mandate covering central departments and arm's-length bodies
  • Ongoing versioning of the standard (v4, May 2025) with published scope and exemptions

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful