evidoria

What works in Senegal

All catalogues

17
evaluated practices
67/100
average quality score
8%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Senegal

Senegal has pursued gender equality through landmark legislation: Senegal's Law on Absolute Gender Parity in Elective Bodies 2010 mandated alternating male-female candidate lists, nearly doubling women's National Assembly representation from 22.7% to 42.7% in 2012 and raising local representation to 47% in 2014 (sustained at 44% in 2022). However, numeric gains have not fully translated to power: the 2010 parity law shows only 2 of 14 Assembly committees were chaired by women despite their 43% seat share, and just 2.7% of mayors were women after 2014. Senegal has also invested in digital literacy and economic entrepreneurship: PAJEF's literacy programme reached over 6,000 girls and women through face-to-face and online channels with a 96% pass rate, while CTIC Dakar incubated 187 companies generating 5.66 billion FCFA (~US$9.4 million) in cumulative revenue.

Drawn from: Senegal's Law on Absolute Gender Parity in Elective Bodies 2010 (Loi 2010-11) · PAJEF — Digital Literacy Project for Girls & Women · Senegal's 2010 Gender Parity Law (Loi sur la Parité) · CTIC Dakar — West Africa's First Public-Private ICT Incubator · Jokko Initiative — Mobile-Phone Literacy for Rural Women · ICB4VI — AI Digital-Literacy Training for Blind and Visually Impaired Adults in Senegal · Concept / ITU Digital Transformation Centres – Senegal · Force-N — Senegal's National AI and Digital Skills Certification Pilot for Teachers

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Equity & inclusion +23 pts 75 here · 52 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +21 pts 58 here · 37 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +19 pts 50 here · 31 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Inclusiveness / equity +16 pts 58 here · 42 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluated outcomes +15 pts 100 here · 85 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Innovation level +8 pts 71 here · 63 average

Weaknesses

Efficiency -11 pts 33 here · 44 average

Governance, certification & transferability -20 pts 44 here · 64 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Equity & inclusion
75 · 52
Teacher capability & pedagogy
58 · 37
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
50 · 31
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
58 · 42
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 51
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 85
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Innovation level
71 · 63
Evidence of impact / measured public value
67 · 59
Transferability / replicability
67 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 28
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 48
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
75 · 76
Scalability & sustainability
63 · 64
Sustainability
77 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Documented learning
67 · 74
Efficiency
33 · 44
Governance, certification & transferability
44 · 64
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54

Coloured bar: Senegal. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Senegal's Law on Absolute Gender Parity in Elective Bodies 2010 (Loi 2010-11) · 96

PAJEF — Digital Literacy Project for Girls & Women · 92

Tostan Community Empowerment Programme — Human-Rights Education & FGC Abandonment, Kolda Region · 89

Senegal's 2010 Gender Parity Law (Loi sur la Parité) · 85

CTIC Dakar — West Africa's First Public-Private ICT Incubator · 76

Jokko Initiative — Mobile-Phone Literacy for Rural Women · 76

ICB4VI — AI Digital-Literacy Training for Blind and Visually Impaired Adults in Senegal · 73

Concept / ITU Digital Transformation Centres – Senegal · 72

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Senegal concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more