evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Botswana's Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA) — A Cautionary Tale in Site-and-Service Housing

Botswana · Gaborone · See the Botswana profile · See the Gaborone profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 93% 43/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Botswana's national self-help housing scheme, running since 1973, allocates serviced plots for owner-built homes. Two evaluations (2007, 2018) of Gaborone plots found rising resale to middle-income buyers is displacing the low-income households the scheme was designed for.

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA), Gaborone City Council
Period
1973-2018
Keywords
self-help housing, site-and-service schemes, land allocation, urban housing

Context

Botswana's Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA) scheme was established in 1973 and administered through local authorities such as Gaborone City Council, as part of a 'site-and-service' model widely promoted across Southern Africa from the 1970s onward.

Objectives

The scheme allocates serviced or semi-serviced plots to low- and lower-middle-income households, who then build their own homes with agency-provided technical guidance and small loans.

Activities

Local authorities allocate plots and provide technical guidance and small loans to allottees for self-build housing construction.

Results

Two peer-reviewed evaluations of SHHA areas in Gaborone reached similar conclusions a decade apart. Ikgopoleng and Cavric (2007, Spatium) and Kampamba, Kachepa, Nkwae, Matlhogojane and Outule (2018, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, surveying 93 plots across old and new SHHA areas using a mixed-methods design at 90% confidence) both found that, on the whole, the scheme's impact on improving low-income urban housing has been unsuccessful. The 2018 study documents an accelerating pattern of property transfers, with original low-income allottees increasingly selling their SHHA plots to middle-income buyers as Gaborone's housing demand and prices rise.

Conclusions

The core structural problems identified are a persistent shortage of serviced land and insufficient finance for plot development. The gentrification pattern risks displacing the low-income group the scheme was built for and pushing them back toward informal settlement.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No public budget figures were found; the model relies on small loans to allottees for self-build rather than full public housing construction, consistent with a low-cost site-and-service design.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Scheme established 1973; independent evaluations conducted in 2007 and 2018, i.e. the scheme had operated for at least 45 years by the time of the most recent study.
Staffing & skills
Local authorities, e.g. Gaborone City Council, administer plot allocation, Agency-provided technical guidance staff support self-build plot development

Conditions for success

  • Provision of serviced/semi-serviced plots combined with technical guidance and small loans for self-build
  • Administration through local authority structures for local delivery

Common failure modes

  • Persistent shortage of serviced land constrains supply (Kampamba et al. 2018)
  • Insufficient finance available for plot development by low-income allottees
  • Increasing resale of allocated plots by low-income beneficiaries to middle-income buyers, risking displacement/gentrification and undermining the scheme's low-income targeting

Where it fits

Governance type
local-authority-administered national scheme
Scale
national programme delivered via city/local councils (evaluations sampled Gaborone)
Income level
lower-middle-income country (Botswana)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy

Austria

Vienna's long-term, legally-binding smart-city strategy (first 2011, updated 2019/2022) aligning resource conservation, quality of life and social inclusion with annual …

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …