evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Botswana's Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA) — A Cautionary Tale in Site-and-Service Housing

Botswana · Gaborone · See the Botswana profile · See the Gaborone profile

Top 95% 43/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Botswana's national self-help housing scheme, running since 1973, allocates serviced plots for owner-built homes. Two evaluations (2007, 2018) of Gaborone plots found rising resale to middle-income buyers is displacing the low-income households the scheme was designed for.

Details

Promoter
Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA), Gaborone City Council
Period
1973-2018
Keywords
self-help housing, site-and-service schemes, land allocation, urban housing

Description

Botswana's Self-Help Housing Agency (SHHA) scheme, established in 1973 and administered through local authorities such as Gaborone City Council, allocates serviced or semi-serviced plots to low- and lower-middle-income households, who then build their own homes with agency-provided technical guidance and small loans — a 'site-and-service' model widely promoted across Southern Africa from the 1970s onward.
Two peer-reviewed evaluations of SHHA areas in Gaborone reached similar conclusions a decade apart. Ikgopoleng and Cavric (2007, Spatium) and Kampamba, Kachepa, Nkwae, Matlhogojane and Outule (2018, International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis) — the latter surveying 93 plots across old and new SHHA areas using a mixed-methods design at 90% confidence — both found that, on the whole, the scheme's impact on improving low-income urban housing has been unsuccessful.
The 2018 study documents an accelerating pattern of property transfers: original low-income allottees are increasingly selling their SHHA plots to middle-income buyers as Gaborone's housing demand and prices rise, a form of gentrification that the authors warn risks displacing the low-income group the scheme was built for and pushing them back toward informal settlement. The core structural problems identified are a persistent shortage of serviced land and insufficient finance for plot development — limitations that, following the evidence rather than the programme's ambition, earn it a cautious rating here.

Read the full analysis: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/ijhma-06-2017-0059/full/html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy

Austria

Vienna's long-term, legally-binding smart-city strategy (first 2011, updated 2019/2022) aligning resource conservation, quality of life and social inclusion with annual …

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …