evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

Børge — Denmark's AI writing assistant for the borger.dk citizen portal's editors

Denmark · Copenhagen · See the Denmark profile

Denmark's Agency for Digital Government built Børge, a Claude-based AI assistant that helps editors from roughly 40 public authorities rewrite around 1,200 borger.dk pages to the portal's plain-language writing guide, with nine user tests rating it a helpful daily 'sparring partn

1,200
Content pages covered
40
Public authorities using the tool
9
Structured user tests conducted
Børge — Denmark's AI writing assistant for the borger.dk citizen portal's editors

Details

Promoter
Digitaliseringsstyrelsen (Danish Agency for Digital Government)
Period
February 2025–ongoing
Keywords
generative AI, digital government, content design, plain language, civil service productivity

Context

borger.dk is Denmark's national citizen portal, with roughly 1,200 content pages maintained by editors from about 40 different public authorities. After Digitaliseringsstyrelsen (the Danish Agency for Digital Government) introduced a stricter plain-language writing guide in September 2023, keeping that content compliant became a heavy editorial burden — the problem Børge, launched in February 2025, was built to ease.

Objectives

To help editors rewrite content to comply with borger.dk's plain-language writing guide while keeping a human in the loop for review and approval.

Activities

Børge is built on Anthropic's Claude 3.5 Sonnet (since upgraded to Claude Sonnet 4.5) combined with a custom prompt encoding the writing guide. It suggests rewrites that editors review and approve before publishing, and is restricted to public, non-sensitive content. Digitaliseringsstyrelsen has publicly published the underlying prompt to support knowledge-sharing across the Danish public sector.

Results

Nine structured user tests with editors found Børge functioned as a genuinely useful 'helping hand in a busy workday,' comparable to sparring with an experienced colleague, especially for authorities managing many pages. No quantitative output-quality or time-saved metrics have yet been published.

Conclusions

The tool's scope remains bounded to this one national portal rather than generalised across other government writing tasks.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful