evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Bujang Raba Village Forest Carbon Project (Jambi, Indonesia)

Indonesia · Muara Bungo · See the Indonesia profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 47% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

KKI Warsi's Plan Vivo-certified village forest project protects 5,000+ ha of primary rainforest in Jambi with 5 communities; a verified 2018 sale of 6,000 tCO2 funded health, education and patrols, and it is now on Indonesia's national carbon registry.

5,000+ hectares
Primary rainforest protected
5
Communities involved
6,000 tCO2
First verified carbon credit sale (2018)
Bujang Raba Village Forest Carbon Project (Jambi, Indonesia)

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
KKI Warsi (Indonesian Conservation Community Foundation)
Period
2013-present
Keywords
village forest, REDD+, Plan Vivo certification, indigenous land rights

Context

KKI Warsi, an Indonesian conservation NGO based in Jambi, has worked since 2013 with five Indigenous and local communities in Bungo Regency to establish and protect the Bujang Raba hutan desa (village forest), covering more than 5,000 hectares of primary rainforest in the Bukit Barisan landscape bordering Kerinci Seblat National Park — habitat for the Sumatran tiger, Malayan tapir and Sun bear. Legal recognition of the village forest gave the communities formal rights to manage and protect the land themselves.

Activities

The project was certified under the Plan Vivo Standard and, after several years without a buyer, completed its first carbon credit sale in 2018 to a Swedish institution through the intermediary Zeromission. Proceeds were earmarked directly for health and education services (including scholarships), strengthening of the five villages' Village Forest institutions, forest patrols, fire prevention and community economic activities, with carbon stock changes verified through forest monitoring and third-party field verification.

Results

In 2018 the project sold 6,000 tonnes of CO2 in its first verified carbon credit transaction. In 2024-2025, Bujang Raba became one of the first community forest carbon projects to receive Indonesian government ministerial approval and registration on SRUK, Indonesia's newly launched national carbon unit registry.

Conclusions

The project illustrates both the promise and the limits of small community carbon deals: despite genuine, verified forest protection and legally secured community tenure, it took roughly five years to find a single buyer for its first credits, and revenue has remained modest and irregular relative to the scale of forest protected, underscoring the market-access barriers facing smallholder and Indigenous-led carbon projects.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No public budget figure disclosed; revenue-generating event was a single 6,000 tCO2 sale in 2018, with proceeds directed to health, education and forest patrols.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Established 2013; first credit sale 2018 (five years to find a buyer); national registry approval 2024-2025.
Staffing & skills
KKI Warsi programme staff, five villages' Village Forest institutions, community forest patrols

Conditions for success

  • Legal village-forest (hutan desa) tenure recognition
  • Plan Vivo third-party certification and field verification
  • Buyer relationship via intermediary (Zeromission)
  • 2024-2025 ministerial approval and SRUK national registry integration

Common failure modes

  • Took roughly five years to find a single buyer for first credits
  • Revenue has remained modest and irregular relative to forest area protected
  • Market-access barriers facing smallholder and Indigenous-led carbon projects

Where it fits

Governance type
community/NGO-managed village forest with national registry integration
Scale
5,000+ hectares, five communities
Income level
lower-middle-income (Indonesia)

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful