What works in Indonesia
All catalogues
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Evidence snapshot for Indonesia
Indonesia has implemented several large-scale programmes addressing digital inclusion, environmental conservation, gender equality, and urban development. Kartu Prakerja reached 14.3 million low-income adults across all 34 provinces, with 65% opening their first e-wallet or bank account, while the Katingan Mentaya REDD+ project conserves 157,875 hectares of tropical peatland with verified avoided emissions of 7.5 million tCO2e annually. MAMPU assisted over 170,000 people to access government services and influenced 315 local-government regulations on women's priorities between 2012 and 2020, and the Kampung Improvement Programme upgraded approximately 7,700 hectares of informal settlements for roughly 3 million residents at around US$60 per capita. However, the evidence base varies: digital skills and environmental conservation programmes rest on randomised trials and verified standards, while gender-equality and urban-upgrading evidence relies on observational or self-reported data.
Drawn from: Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · Katingan Mentaya REDD+ Peatland Conservation Project (Indonesia) · MAMPU - Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment · Kampung Improvement Programme — Jakarta's In-Situ Slum-Upgrading Model · Jakarta Smart City & the JAKI App — Citizen-Reporting and Open-Data Command Centre · Indonesia East Kalimantan Jurisdictional Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF Carbon Fund) · Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA) — Indonesia's Women- and Child-Friendly Village Programme · Bandung Smart City — Indonesia's Integrated Digital Urban Management Programme
Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average
Evidence of learning impact +25 pts 52 here · 28 average
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +22 pts 53 here · 31 average
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +16 pts 23 here · 7 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average
Weaknesses
Transparency, ethics & data protection -9 pts 38 here · 48 average
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -10 pts 40 here · 50 average
Transferability / replicability -15 pts 44 here · 59 average
Sustainability (ongoing) -17 pts 62 here · 78 average
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -19 pts 57 here · 76 average
Documented learning -24 pts 50 here · 74 average
Demonstrated reach -26 pts 50 here · 76 average
Effectiveness -27 pts 50 here · 77 average
Impact on gender equality -30 pts 50 here · 80 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Indonesia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · 96
Katingan Mentaya REDD+ Peatland Conservation Project (Indonesia) · 87
MAMPU - Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment · 85
Kampung Improvement Programme — Jakarta's In-Situ Slum-Upgrading Model · 81
Jakarta Smart City & the JAKI App — Citizen-Reporting and Open-Data Command Centre · 71
Indonesia East Kalimantan Jurisdictional Emission Reductions Programme (FCPF Carbon Fund) · 67
Bandung Smart City — Indonesia's Integrated Digital Urban Management Programme · 62
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Cities with evaluated practice
Where the documented practice in Indonesia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 3 other places
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 4 other places
Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Already adopted in 6 other places
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more