Since April 2019, Canada's Directive on Automated Decision-Making has made federal departments score AI risk and publish Algorithmic Impact Assessments before go-live; by Aug 2024, 22 were public on the Open Government Portal.
22
Algorithmic Impact Assessments published (by August 2024)
1 April 2019
Directive in force since
Details
Maturity
Established
Promoter
Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat
Period
2019–present
Keywords
digital government, AI governance, administrative law, public sector accountability
Context
Canada's Directive on Automated Decision-Making, issued 4 March 2019 and in force from 1 April 2019, requires federal departments to assess, mitigate and disclose the impacts of automated decision systems used in administrative decisions about the public, centred on the Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) - a questionnaire scoring risk on a four-level scale.
Objectives
Ensure departments assess and publicly disclose the risks of automated decision systems before they go into production, for systems scored Level II and above.
Activities
Departments completed AIAs covering systems including automated triage tools for immigration applications, the ArriveCAN proof-of-vaccination recognition system, and disability-benefit decision support. A 2023 update added requirements to assess impacts by gender and age. Since November 2025 the public register has held individual records for every federal automated decision system.
Results
As of August 2024, Canadian federal agencies had published 22 AIAs. A February 2025 review by the World Privacy Forum found the framework had been revised multiple times but flagged expertise shortages inside departments, difficulty designing risk-scoring questions, and publication requirements 'often met only in a partial manner.'
Conclusions
Six years in, the directive stands as one of the most mature statutory frameworks for disclosing government AI use before deployment, while its own external reviewers document that coverage and rigour remain uneven across departments; the review's own conclusion was candid that whether the AIA approach 'works as intended' remains an open question.
The UK's Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard requires central government bodies to publish structured records of algorithmic tools that significantly influence …