evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Cantareira Water Producer Programme — Payments for Watershed Restoration (São Paulo, Brazil)

Brazil · Nazaré Paulista · See the Brazil profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 47% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Brazil's pioneering Water Producer scheme, piloted 2008–2015 in São Paulo's Cantareira system, signed 41 PES contracts covering 342 hectares of forest restoration and soil conservation, paying landowners US$6–31/ha/year to protect water for 15 million residents.

41
PES contracts signed (2008-2015) (2008-2015)
125 properties (~2,898 ha)
Rural properties covered
6.25-31.25 US$/ha/year
Payment rate range
342.4 ha (39% of target)
Contracted area delivered
64.2 ha
Riparian forest restoration area
90.8 ha
Soil conservation area
187.4 ha
Forest conservation area
~49,250 US$ (~50% of budget)
Landowner-payment funds disbursed
~12 x
Overhead-to-payment ratio
~36 %
Modeled sediment-load reduction (restoring 4,000 ha)
28 %
Modeled return on investment for SABESP
Cantareira Water Producer Programme — Payments for Watershed Restoration (São Paulo, Brazil)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Agência Nacional de Águas (ANA) / SABESP / The Nature Conservancy Brasil
Period
2005–present (Cantareira sites core implementation 2009–2013)
Keywords
water utility, watershed restoration, smallholder agriculture, payments for ecosystem services

Context

In 2004, Brazil's national water agency (Agência Nacional de Águas, ANA) designed the Water Producer Programme (Produtor de Água) — the country's first scheme channeling statutory watershed-committee water-use charges into payments for forest restoration. The Cantareira pilot operated in the Nazaré Paulista and Joanópolis catchments of the PCJ basin, part of the system supplying about 15 million residents across the São Paulo and Campinas metropolitan regions.

Objectives

Establish a replicable payments-for-ecosystem-services (PES) model that finances watershed restoration — riparian forest restoration, soil conservation and forest conservation — by paying rural landowners to protect water-supply catchments.

Activities

Between 2008 and 2015, 41 PES contracts were signed with landowners across 125 rural properties (about 2,898 ha), paying US$6.25–US$31.25 per hectare per year for riparian forest restoration, soil conservation and forest conservation practices.

Results

The programme delivered 342.4 hectares under contract — about 39% of its original target — comprising 64.2 ha of riparian forest restoration, 90.8 ha of soil conservation and 187.4 ha of forest conservation. About US$49,250 (roughly 50%) of budgeted landowner payments was disbursed, and overhead spending was roughly 12 times higher than the PES payments themselves. Separate modeling by WRI/TNC estimated that restoring 4,000 hectares could reduce sediment loads by about 36%, with a modeled 28% return on investment for the water utility SABESP.

Conclusions

The pilot's modest contracted area relative to its target and its high overhead-to-payment ratio are limitations documented in the peer-reviewed literature; despite these constraints, the PES model has since been replicated by dozens of Brazilian municipalities.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Total landowner payments budgeted at roughly US$98,500, with ~US$49,250 disbursed; overhead spending approximately 12 times the value of PES payments.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Programme design 2004; PES pilot contracts signed and implemented 2008-2015; model has continued to be replicated elsewhere since.
Staffing & skills
Agência Nacional de Águas (ANA) designed and coordinated the programme, SABESP (water utility) and The Nature Conservancy Brasil as implementing partners administering PES contracts with rural landowners

Conditions for success

  • Statutory watershed-committee water-use charges as a dedicated funding stream
  • Direct landowner payments tied to specific conservation practices
  • Monitoring and peer-reviewed evaluation enabling lessons-learned documentation

Common failure modes

  • Contracted area reached only 39% of target
  • Overhead costs about 12x the value of payments to landowners, reducing cost-efficiency
  • Only half of budgeted landowner payments were actually disbursed

Where it fits

Governance type
national agency-led PES scheme with municipal/utility partners
Scale
sub-basin/catchment pilot (~2,898 ha)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful