A quasi-experimental study of 60 dyslexic Arabic-speaking children (8-11) in UAE public and private schools found a ChatGPT-based reading group significantly outperformed a control group on sentence-comprehension and reading-maze tests.
60 ages 8-11, diagnosed dyslexia
Children in the study
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Al Ain University (Abu Dhabi) & King Abdulaziz University (Jeddah)
Period
Study conducted 2024-2025; published November 2025
Keywords
special education, generative AI, dyslexia, Arabic-language literacy
Context
A quasi-experimental study by Mahmoud Gharaibeh (Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi) and Abdullah Basulayyim (King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah) tested whether ChatGPT-based reading instruction could improve comprehension for Arabic-speaking children with dyslexia.
Objectives
Test whether supplementing standard instruction with ChatGPT-based reading exercises improves sentence-comprehension and reading-maze performance for diagnosed dyslexic children, relative to standard instruction alone.
Activities
60 children aged 8-11, diagnosed with dyslexia, from public and private schools across the UAE, were divided into control and experimental groups. The experimental group received ChatGPT-based reading instruction during regular school hours, while the control group followed standard instruction. Both groups sat pre- and post-tests of equivalent difficulty but different content, using the Sentence Reading Comprehension Test and the Reading Maze Test.
Results
The published results report a statistically significant improvement in reading-comprehension scores for the experimental group relative to the control group, with post-test results showing increased sentence-comprehension accuracy and better contextual understanding of reading material.
Conclusions
The authors conclude that ChatGPT-based exercises show promise as a supplementary tool in remedial reading programmes for children with dyslexia, but the published abstract omits exact effect sizes, p-values, allocation method, arm sizes, and any data-protection or informed-consent protocol for using a commercial generative-AI tool with children — real gaps that limit generalisability.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — An academic study using a commercial, consumer-facing ChatGPT tool integrated into regular school-hours instruction; no bespoke technical infrastructure or budget is described.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Conducted 2024-2025 and published in Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, Vol. 20, No. 8, November 2025.
Staffing & skills
Researchers from Al Ain University (Abu Dhabi) and King Abdulaziz University (Jeddah), School staff administering standard instruction to the control group
Conditions for success
Delivering the AI-based instruction during regular school hours rather than as an extracurricular add-on
Using validated pre/post instruments (Sentence Reading Comprehension Test, Reading Maze Test) of equivalent difficulty across time points
Common failure modes
Allocation method (randomised or not) and arm sizes are not reported, limiting confidence in group comparability
No data-protection or informed-consent protocol for using a commercial generative-AI tool with children is described
Exact effect sizes and p-values are not reported in the published abstract
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Puerto Rico's Department of Education rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 20,000+ teachers and 220,000+ students, cutting assessment-writing time from an …