Top 71%
in this catalogue (825 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Transferability / replicability1/3
The internal-registry mechanism is simple to copy, but its known weaknesses (narrow 'same work' test, no public disclosure) mean transferring this exact design is not advisable; scored low to reflect limited value as a model to replicate.
Impact on gender equality0/1
Independent 2024 studies (Buk, Laborum) show the pay gap essentially unchanged or worse (21.7-27%) fifteen years after enactment, with leadership-role gaps widening in 2023.
Effectiveness0/1
Labour-law academics on record (Gamonal) describe the law as ineffective, citing the outdated 'same work' standard that lets employers evade claims through minor title changes.
Efficiency0/1
The mandatory 30-day internal complaint procedure before any judicial claim adds process cost without demonstrated benefit, and is cited as discouraging claims.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
Two independent market studies (Buk 2024, Laborum 2024) provide longitudinal wage-gap tracking that constitutes a real, if negative, evaluation of outcomes.
Sustainability1/1
The registry obligation has remained continuously in force since 2010, though its shortcomings are prompting a pending legislative replacement.
Achievement / evidence0/1
By the government's and legal community's own assessment, the law has not achieved its stated goal of closing the gender pay gap.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
The law is a dedicated gender-pay-equity provision within the Labour Code, gender-focused by explicit design even though weak in practice.
Curator validation1/1
The wage-gap figures and legal critique are corroborated across an independent news outlet and an HR/legal blog citing separate market studies (Buk, Laborum).
Evidoria. Chile's Equal Pay Law (Ley 20.348, 2009): Internal Wage Registries That Did Not Close the Gap. Persistent ID: 9317e816-3c65-4543-b97b-a9bf284f6e11.