evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice

China's 2025 National Guideline on Generative AI Use in Primary and Secondary Schools

China · Beijing · See the China profile

China's May 2025 national guideline tiers generative-AI school use by age: primary pupils barred from unsupervised open-ended AI, middle-schoolers examine its logic, high-schoolers build models -- with mandatory data-protection rules and tool whitelists.

China's 2025 National Guideline on Generative AI Use in Primary and Secondary Schools

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (Committee on Basic Education Teaching Guidance)
Period
Issued May 2025; implementation ongoing
Keywords
AI governance, K-12 policy, generative AI regulation, data protection, curriculum guidance

Description

In May 2025, the education-ministry-affiliated Committee on Basic Education Teaching Guidance issued China's first national "Guide to Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Primary and Secondary Schools," tiering permitted use by age. Primary-school pupils are barred from independently using open-ended generative AI tools and may only use them under direct teacher supervision; middle-school students may examine the logical structure behind AI-generated content; and high-school students may go further, designing, testing and critiquing AI models as part of interdisciplinary and systems-level projects.

The guideline bans teachers from using AI to grade students, answer exam questions on their behalf, or process sensitive personal data, and bans students from submitting AI-generated work as their own or using AI to cheat. It instructs local education authorities to formulate area-specific AI management rules, set up data-protection safeguards, run ethical-review mechanisms, and maintain a dynamic "whitelist" of generative-AI tools approved for use on school grounds -- rather than leaving procurement and safety vetting to individual schools or teachers.

The guideline followed several years of controversy over facial-recognition and behaviour-monitoring cameras in Chinese classrooms, which the Ministry of Education had already pledged in 2019 to "curb and regulate" after a public backlash at China Pharmaceutical University. As a compulsory national policy rather than a voluntary recommendation, it is unusually prescriptive by international standards, but it is also brand new: as of mid-2025 there is no independent evaluation of how consistently schools maintain whitelists, run ethical reviews, or enforce the age tiers in practice.

Read the full analysis: https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202505/16/WS6826951fa310a04af22bfc2e.html

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful