evidoria

What works in Beijing

All catalogues · China profile

9
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 9 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Beijing

Beijing hosts Zhongguancun Science Park, China's premier innovation district, which by 2024 hosted approximately 28,300 high-tech enterprises, 93 unicorn companies, and 2.7 million employees generating ~7.6 trillion yuan in revenue. The city has also launched compulsory AI education across 1,400+ primary and secondary schools from 2025, requiring at least 8 hours per year — though this mandate is too new to demonstrate learning outcomes. These initiatives reflect Beijing's positioning as a major technology and innovation hub, though quantified impact data on the AI education program remains unavailable.

Drawn from: Zhongguancun Science Park (Z-Park) — China's National Innovation Hub · Zhongguancun Science Park — Beijing's Original Innovation and Technology-Transfer Zone · Spring Bud Project: Nationwide Scholarships for Rural Girls' Education · China Sloping Land Conversion Programme (Grain for Green / SLCP) · Beijing's compulsory AI education in schools · CNIPA's Patent Intelligent Examination and Search System — China's Nationwide AI Roll-out With a Built-in Guardrail · Pigai — China's Large-Scale AI Essay Feedback Platform: Real Reach, Mixed Classroom Evidence · China's Algorithm Filing System — Mandatory Disclosure to Regulators Without Public Transparency

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +65 pts 100 here · 35 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +49 pts 100 here · 51 average

Innovation +36 pts 100 here · 64 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Scalability & sustainability +24 pts 90 here · 66 average

Sustainability / continuity +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Equity & inclusion -10 pts 44 here · 54 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Inclusiveness / equity -24 pts 17 here · 41 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
100 · 35
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 51
Innovation
100 · 64
Curator validation
100 · 75
Scalability & sustainability
90 · 66
Sustainability / continuity
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Transparency, ethics & data protection
56 · 50
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 39
Transferability / demonstrated replication
60 · 59
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Evidence of impact / measured results
58 · 60
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 30
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Equity & inclusion
44 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
17 · 41
Efficiency
0 · 52
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Beijing. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Zhongguancun Science Park (Z-Park) — China's National Innovation Hub · 81

Zhongguancun Science Park — Beijing's Original Innovation and Technology-Transfer Zone · 76

Spring Bud Project: Nationwide Scholarships for Rural Girls' Education · 74

China Sloping Land Conversion Programme (Grain for Green / SLCP) · 67

Beijing's compulsory AI education in schools · 60

CNIPA's Patent Intelligent Examination and Search System — China's Nationwide AI Roll-out With a Built-in Guardrail · 53

Pigai — China's Large-Scale AI Essay Feedback Platform: Real Reach, Mixed Classroom Evidence · 47

China's Algorithm Filing System — Mandatory Disclosure to Regulators Without Public Transparency · 47

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more