A 5-week AI-literacy module for pre-service physics teachers across nine Kazakhstani universities, led by Zhetysu University, raised literacy scores far above a no-intervention control group (10.20 vs 7.34, decisive Bayesian evidence), Frontiers in Education, 2025.
10.20 mean score (SD 1.19)
Post-intervention AI-literacy score, trained group (2024)
7.34 mean score (SD 0.62)
Post-intervention AI-literacy score, comparison group (2024)
95.948 log Bayes factor
Bayesian evidence for effect (Log BF10) (2024)
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Zhetysu University
Period
2024
Keywords
higher education, teacher training, physics education, AI literacy
Context
Zhetysu University's Department of Physics and Mathematics in Taldykorgan coordinated a study recruiting physics teacher-education students from nine Kazakhstani universities for a voluntary, out-of-curriculum AI-literacy programme, addressing a documented gap in future physics teachers' readiness to use generative AI responsibly.
Objectives
The 5-week module aimed to build seven AI competencies for pre-service physics teachers: judging AI's suitability for a physics problem, generating scenarios, simplifying concepts, building lesson plans and assessments, critically evaluating AI output, and addressing privacy and security concerns.
Activities
An intervention group (n=59) attended weekly ~60-minute synchronous sessions via Google Meet plus asynchronous Google Classroom activities using tools including ChatGPT, Gemini, eduaide.ai and magicschool.ai; a self-selected comparison group (n=77) received no training.
Results
Post-intervention AI-literacy scores were substantially higher in the trained group (mean 10.20, SD 1.19) than in the comparison group (mean 7.34, SD 0.62); Bayesian analysis found decisive evidence for the effect (Log BF10=95.948).
Conclusions
The authors note the 5-week duration may be too short for durable retention, the sample was 89.7% female, self-selection rather than randomisation separated the groups, and generalisation is confined to physics education within one country.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
MUST, Mongolia's IIOE National Centre, runs a train-the-trainer micro-certification scheme with UNESCO-ICHEI, giving AI and digital-competency micro-credentials to 1,800+ teachers …
A professional-development programme for 37 pre-service teachers at Palestine Technical University Kadoorie and Hebron University used a validated AI-literacy scale …