evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Collaborative Accessible-Space Mapping — Co-Designing Disability-Inclusive Cartography in Ibagué, Colombia

Colombia · Ibagué · See the Colombia profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 55% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Researchers at Colombia's UNAD co-designed a collaborative-cartography mobile app with 30 people with sensorial and physical disabilities in Ibagué, letting them map and share accessible locations across the city in a peer-reviewed study.

30
Co-design participants with disabilities (2018–2020)
Collaborative Accessible-Space Mapping — Co-Designing Disability-Inclusive Cartography in Ibagué, Colombia

Details

Promoter
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia (UNAD) — Disability, Affect and Cognition Research Group
Period
2018–2021 (fieldwork through publication)
Keywords
urban planning, civic tech, participatory research, disability mapping

Context

Between 2018 and 2020, UNAD's Disability, Affect and Cognition Research Group ran a participatory study in Ibagué, Colombia, directly involving 30 people with sensorial and physical disabilities in co-designing a mobile collaborative-mapping app, with participants themselves identifying and mapping accessible and inaccessible locations across the city.

Results

The study was published as a peer-reviewed article (Zenodo, 2020) and a Springer book chapter (2021), analysing results through accessibility, the social dimension of the city, and 'resignification' of urban space by disabled residents; no public evidence was found that the app was maintained or opened to the wider population after the study concluded.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
university researchers, psychology students, disabled co-researchers

Conditions for success

  • directly involving disabled residents as co-designers and mappers rather than as study subjects

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful