evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Collaborative Accessible-Space Mapping — Co-Designing Disability-Inclusive Cartography in Ibagué, Colombia

Colombia · Ibagué · See the Colombia profile

Top 54% 72/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Researchers at Colombia's UNAD co-designed a collaborative-cartography mobile app with 30 people with sensorial and physical disabilities in Ibagué, letting them map and share accessible locations across the city in a peer-reviewed study.

Collaborative Accessible-Space Mapping — Co-Designing Disability-Inclusive Cartography in Ibagué, Colombia

Details

Promoter
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia (UNAD) — Disability, Affect and Cognition Research Group
Period
2018–2021 (fieldwork through publication)
Keywords
urban planning, civic tech, participatory research, disability mapping

Description

Between 2018 and 2020, the Disability, Affect and Cognition Research Group at Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia (UNAD), working with psychology students, ran a mixed-methods participatory study in Ibagué, Colombia, that directly involved 30 people with sensorial and physical disabilities in co-designing a mobile collaborative-mapping application. Rather than a top-down accessibility audit, participants themselves identified and mapped accessible and inaccessible locations across the city, contributing their lived experience of navigating public space to a shared, crowdsourced cartography.

The study, published as "Physical and represented city: disability, spatial justice and social innovation" (Zenodo, 2020) and as a chapter in a Springer collection (2021), analysed the results through three lenses — accessibility, the social dimension of the city, and "resignification" of urban space by disabled residents — and frames the resulting app as a social-innovation mechanism for community inclusion and participation, distinct from researcher-led accessibility surveys.

As an academic pilot rather than a scaled public service, the practice has clear strengths — peer-reviewed methodology, a defined and disclosed sample, and direct participation by disabled co-researchers — and clear limits: no public evidence was found that the app was maintained, opened to Ibagué's wider population, or adopted by the municipal government after the study concluded, so sustainability and city-wide reach beyond the 30 participants remain unverified.

Read the full analysis: https://zenodo.org/records/4278344

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful