Top 39%
in this catalogue (246 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Evidence of impact / measured public value2/3
FAO's technical paper reports quantitative backtested skill scores (HSS 0.82 no-drought, 0.65–0.68 moderate drought) and >80% match with observed conditions over 2011–2022, but no post-activation outcome data (e.g. damage avoided, funds disbursed) is yet available.
Transparency, fairness & accountability2/3
The methodology is published as an open-access, DOI-registered FAO technical working paper with full model specification, but there is no discussion of fairness/accountability for how AA disbursement decisions are made once the index triggers.
Transferability / demonstrated replication1/3
The paper explicitly frames the model as a pilot that 'will require regular testing, revision and calibration' and has not yet been replicated to other countries or hazard types.
Scalability beyond pilot2/3
The system moved from a pilot in five high-risk municipalities to a nationally-scoped ASIS portal by 2026, but full national operational status and multi-year track record are not yet demonstrated.
Governance, capability & sustainability2/3
Delivery spans a stable multi-institutional structure (FAO, two government ministries, Civil Protection Authority) with continued funding secured via the Green Climate Fund for the successor ASIS portal.
Evidoria. Combined Drought Index — Timor-Leste's AI-Assisted Anticipatory Action System for Agricultural Drought. Persistent ID: 9763fcad-a46a-4d38-a3c0-1bf14fb2dfd4.