evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Community-Based Management of Walnut-Fruit Forests and Pastures — Jalal-Abad Region (Kyrgyzstan)

Kyrgyzstan · Arslanbob · See the Kyrgyzstan profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 81% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A EUR4.9M GIZ programme (2018-2023) reformed community leasehold management of the world's largest natural walnut forest in southern Kyrgyzstan to curb 75% pasture/forest degradation — though a household survey found leaseholding forest users earned less than non-users.

14,417 KGS (~US$165)
Average annual income, forest-leaseholding households
48,789 KGS (~US$559)
Average annual income, non-forest-user households
61.3 %
Forest users satisfied with lease policy
71 %
Forest users considering lease fees too expensive
4.9 EUR million
Programme budget
Community-Based Management of Walnut-Fruit Forests and Pastures — Jalal-Abad Region (Kyrgyzstan)

Details

Promoter
GIZ / World Agroforestry (ICRAF) / Kyrgyz Academy of Sciences / State forest enterprises (leshozes)
Period
2018-2023
Keywords
agroforestry, community land tenure, forestry, rural livelihoods

Context

The walnut-fruit forests of Jalal-Abad region in southern Kyrgyzstan, centred on villages like Arslanbob, contain the world's largest area of naturally grown walnut forest. Soviet-era state forest enterprises (leshozes) lease plots to local households, but up to 75% of the surrounding pastures and forests are degraded from overgrazing and unsustainable harvesting. From September 2018 to July 2023, Germany's GIZ ran a EUR 4.9 million programme with Kyrgyz state forest agencies and research partners (World Agroforestry/ICRAF, the Kyrgyz Academy of Sciences, Rhine-Waal and Eberswalde universities) to strengthen community-based leasehold management in the Bazar-Korgon and Aksy districts.

Activities

The programme improved monitoring, trained smallholders in agroforestry, and helped 'wild walnut kernels' gain a dedicated international UNECE product quality standard (DDP-02) to open better export markets.

Results

A peer-reviewed household survey of the neighbouring Toskool-Ata leshoz (71,723 ha, including 2,861 ha of walnut forest) found forest-leaseholding households earned on average just 14,417 KGS (about US$165) per year versus 48,789 KGS (about US$559) for non-forest-user households in the same communities, both well below Kyrgyzstan's roughly US$1,323 per-capita income. Only 61.3% of forest users were satisfied with the lease policy, 71% considered lease fees too expensive, and 62% found the leasing process complicated, though 74.1% said they would plant more trees if given government fencing support. Agroforestry trials found that planting entirely new tree-crop plots barely generates income, whereas thinning older trees for timber before replanting with young walnut and companion crops does.

Conclusions

The programme reflects a genuine effort to formalise and improve community forest governance in an ecologically unique landscape, but the evaluation data show the leasehold model has not yet closed the income gap between forest-dependent and other rural households, and satisfaction with governance remains mixed.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — EUR 4.9 million GIZ programme budget, September 2018-July 2023.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Nearly five-year programme (September 2018-July 2023); the underlying leasehold system is a long-standing Soviet-era institution being reformed rather than newly created.
Staffing & skills
GIZ project staff, World Agroforestry (ICRAF) researchers, Kyrgyz Academy of Sciences, Rhine-Waal and Eberswalde universities, State forest enterprises (leshozes)

Conditions for success

  • Combining monitoring, agroforestry training and export-market development (UNECE DDP-02 standard) rather than land-tenure reform alone
  • Willingness of forest users to plant more trees when given government fencing support (74.1% in survey)

Common failure modes

  • Forest-leaseholding households earn substantially less (14,417 KGS/yr) than non-forest-user households (48,789 KGS/yr) in the same communities, showing the leasehold model has not closed the income gap
  • 71% of forest users consider lease fees too expensive and 62% find the leasing process complicated
  • Only 61.3% of forest users are satisfied with the lease policy

Where it fits

Governance type
state forest enterprise (leshoz) leasehold system with donor-funded technical support
Scale
district-level (Bazar-Korgon and Aksy districts)
Income level
low/lower-middle-income

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful