evidoria

What works in Kyrgyzstan

All catalogues

20
evaluated practices
50/100
average quality score
6%
strong evidence, of 18 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Kyrgyzstan

Drawn from: Giga's Real-Time School-Connectivity Map — Kyrgyzstan Cuts Costs by Up to 43% and Lifts Internet Access From 68% to 84% of Public Schools · Digital CASA – Kyrgyz Republic Project · Tunduk — Kyrgyzstan's National Data-Exchange & Digital ID Platform · Learning for the Future — Kyrgyzstan's World Bank–Korea Partnership for Teacher Digital Skills · High Technology Park of the Kyrgyz Republic — Central Asia's Tax-Free IT Export Zone · AI-Assisted Portable X-Ray Screening for Tuberculosis — Kyrgyzstan's National TB Programme · Unified AI Monitoring System for Glacial Lake Outburst Floods — Kyrgyzstan's Ministry of Emergency Situations · Digital Skills & AI-Readiness Framework for Teachers — Kyrgyz Republic

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Equity & inclusion +28 pts 78 here · 49 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence +18 pts 67 here · 49 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +18 pts 56 here · 38 average

Achievement / evidence +14 pts 100 here · 86 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transferability / demonstrated replication -8 pts 52 here · 60 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 47 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -18 pts 56 here · 73 average

Inclusiveness / equity -21 pts 22 here · 43 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -21 pts 27 here · 48 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -29 pts 25 here · 54 average

Efficiency -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Impact on gender equality -69 pts 0 here · 69 average

Evaluated outcomes -78 pts 0 here · 78 average

Score profile vs peers

Equity & inclusion
78 · 49
Curator validation
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluation evidence
67 · 49
Teacher capability & pedagogy
56 · 38
Achievement / evidence
100 · 86
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Innovation level
67 · 62
Evidence of impact / measured public value
62 · 57
Scalability beyond pilot
63 · 62
Sustainability (ongoing)
79 · 78
Governance, capability & sustainability
59 · 64
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
20 · 27
Documented learning
67 · 74
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
40 · 48
Transferability / demonstrated replication
52 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 47
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
56 · 73
Inclusiveness / equity
22 · 43
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
27 · 48
Transparency, fairness & accountability
25 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 31
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Impact on gender equality
0 · 69
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 78

Coloured bar: Kyrgyzstan. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Giga's Real-Time School-Connectivity Map — Kyrgyzstan Cuts Costs by Up to 43% and Lifts Internet Access From 68% to 84% of Public Schools · 96

Digital CASA – Kyrgyz Republic Project · 92

Tunduk — Kyrgyzstan's National Data-Exchange & Digital ID Platform · 76

Learning for the Future — Kyrgyzstan's World Bank–Korea Partnership for Teacher Digital Skills · 67

High Technology Park of the Kyrgyz Republic — Central Asia's Tax-Free IT Export Zone · 62

AI-Assisted Portable X-Ray Screening for Tuberculosis — Kyrgyzstan's National TB Programme · 60

Unified AI Monitoring System for Glacial Lake Outburst Floods — Kyrgyzstan's Ministry of Emergency Situations · 60

Digital Skills & AI-Readiness Framework for Teachers — Kyrgyz Republic · 53

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Kyrgyzstan concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more