evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Court-Ordered Counselling Delegation for Domestic Violence Offenders — South Korea's Article 40 Protective Disposition

South Korea · Seoul · See the South Korea profile · See the Seoul profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 67% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

South Korean family courts can order domestic-violence offenders into counselling delegation, the country's most-used protective disposition under Article 40. A 2008 study of 65 agencies found a 43% dropout rate before completion.

43.2 %
Dropout rate before completion (65 agencies, 280 perpetrators) (2008 study)
6,376 of 13,074
Cases disposed to counselling delegation (2023)
Court-Ordered Counselling Delegation for Domestic Violence Offenders — South Korea's Article 40 Protective Disposition

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Gender Equality and Family (renamed Ministry of Gender Equality, Oct 2025)
Period
1990s–present
Keywords
justice, domestic violence, counselling, family courts

Context

Under Article 40 of South Korea's domestic-violence law, family court judges may order perpetrators into delegated counselling at an accredited centre, standards for which are set by the gender-equality ministry.

Activities

In 2023, roughly half of all disposed domestic-violence cases nationally resulted in the counselling-delegation disposition, the system's single most-used protective sanction.

Results

A 2008 peer-reviewed study spanning 65 agencies and 280 perpetrators found a 43.2% dropout rate before completion, linked to unemployment, referral pathway and gender-role attitudes.

Conclusions

No public, programme-wide recidivism dataset was found, and a 2024 newspaper investigation criticised the system's overall leniency and underuse of more intensive measures.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
accredited domestic-violence counselling centres, family court judges

Conditions for success

  • accreditation and funding by the gender-equality ministry

Common failure modes

  • 43% dropout before completion
  • no public programme-wide recidivism dataset

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful