evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

De Waag — the Netherlands' National Forensic Outpatient Network Treating Domestic-Violence Perpetrators

Netherlands · Utrecht · See the Netherlands profile · See the Utrecht profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 56% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

De Waag, the Netherlands' largest forensic mental-health provider, has treated domestic-violence perpetrators since 1992 through a 12-city outpatient network combining safety-focused de-escalation with longer-term therapy. A 2022 peer-reviewed study profiled 453 of its clients.

366
Male outpatients in the 2022 risk-assessment study (2022)
87
Female outpatients in the 2022 risk-assessment study (2022)
De Waag — the Netherlands' National Forensic Outpatient Network Treating Domestic-Violence Perpetrators

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
De Waag (De Forensische Zorgspecialisten)
Period
1992–present
Keywords
forensic mental health, domestic violence treatment, criminal justice, healthcare

Context

De Waag is the largest provider of outpatient forensic mental healthcare in the Netherlands, operating from 12 locations nationwide as part of De Forensische Zorgspecialisten. Since starting in 1992 as the outpatient arm of the Van der Hoeven Clinic, it has run a dedicated care pathway for domestic violence treating both perpetrators and, wherever possible, their partners or family members.

Activities

Treatment follows two phases: first, clients learn to recognise escalating tension and use de-escalation techniques; second, therapy addresses the underlying relational and psychological patterns that sustain the violence. Delivery is flexible — individual, couple, group, or combined — with voluntary or GP/justice-system referral.

Results

A 2022 study in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence analysed structured risk assessments for 366 male and 87 female De Waag outpatients referred for domestic-violence treatment, finding the criminogenic factors predicting treatment dropout (criminal history, substance abuse, unstable housing, lack of support) differed by gender.

Conclusions

The available evidence documents who is treated and why they drop out, not whether treatment reduces reoffending: no published outcome or recidivism evaluation of the De Waag domestic-violence pathway was located, so effectiveness should be considered unproven rather than demonstrated.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
forensic mental-health clinicians at 12 De Waag locations nationwide

Conditions for success

  • flexible delivery formats (individual, couple, group)
  • voluntary and justice-system referral pathways sustaining a large research-scale caseload

Common failure modes

  • no published outcome or recidivism evaluation of the domestic-violence pathway exists — effectiveness is unproven, not demonstrated
  • predictive risk factors for dropout differ by gender, meaning a one-size approach is unlikely to fit all clients

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful