evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

DeafBlind Technology Training Center — Seattle's City-Funded 1:1 Digital Skills Program for DeafBlind Adults

United States of America · Seattle · See the United States of America profile · See the Seattle profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 61% 68/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The Lighthouse for the Blind's Technology Training Center in Seattle used a 2025 city Technology Matching Fund grant to deliver 153 one-on-one digital-skills sessions (354 hours) in ASL and Protactile Sign Language to 12 DeafBlind adults, building braille-display, smartphone and

12
DeafBlind adults enrolled (June 2025-June 2026)
354
Training hours delivered (June 2025-June 2026)
DeafBlind Technology Training Center — Seattle's City-Funded 1:1 Digital Skills Program for DeafBlind Adults

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
The Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc.
Period
June 2025 – June 2026
Keywords
assistive technology, digital skills, disability services, accessibility

Context

The Lighthouse for the Blind's Technology Training Center in Seattle ran a 'Digital Training for DeafBlind Adults' project from June 2025 to June 2026, partly funded by a City of Seattle Technology Matching Fund grant, delivering individualised instruction in American Sign Language and Protactile Sign Language.

Results

12 DeafBlind adults completed 153 sessions and 354 hours of one-on-one training covering typing, email, office software and braille-display pairing applied to everyday tasks. The City reports participants self-reported improved digital skills, self-sufficiency and workplace communication.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc., ASL/Protactile Sign Language instructors, City of Seattle Technology Matching Fund

Conditions for success

  • Continued grant funding beyond the pilot period
  • Accessible classroom equipment (braille displays, adapted lighting)

Common failure modes

  • Grant period ended with strong unmet demand to continue

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 72

Centre for Assistive Technology

The overall objective of the Center for Assistive Technology (CAT) is to contribute to the active inclusion of persons with …