evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA) — Indonesia's Women- and Child-Friendly Village Programme

Indonesia · Jakarta · See the Indonesia profile · See the Jakarta profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 55% 63/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Indonesia's Ministry of Women's Empowerment certifies villages that embed gender and child-rights criteria into local governance; grown from 138 pilot villages (2020) to 1,967 by 2024, though independent case studies show uneven, mixed implementation on the ground.

138
Pilot villages at launch (November 2020)
71
Districts/cities covered at launch (November 2020)
1967
Committed villages and sub-villages nationwide (April 2024)
3886
Female village heads nationwide at programme launch (2020)
Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA) — Indonesia's Women- and Child-Friendly Village Programme

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak (Kemen PPPA), with Kementerian Desa PDTT
Period
2020–present
Keywords
village governance, child protection, gender mainstreaming, violence prevention, child-marriage prevention

Context

Indonesia's Ministry of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection launched Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA — Women- and Child-Friendly Village) in November 2020 with 138 pilot villages across 71 districts, asking villages to adopt local regulations embedding gender/child-rights criteria into planning and budgeting, establish violence-case services, promote women's entrepreneurship and increase women's presence in village deliberative bodies, in a country where only 3,886 female village heads existed nationwide at launch.

Results

By the ministry's own count, DRPPA had grown to 1,967 committed villages and sub-villages nationwide by April 2024, and in July 2025 UNICEF co-launched pilot women- and child-friendly villages in Southwest Papua, indicating adoption beyond the originating ministry.

Conclusions

No rigorous, independent, population-level impact evaluation was found. A 2024 Diponegoro University thesis comparing two Purbalingga villages found one succeeded through strong local coordination while a neighbouring village struggled with limited resources and low participation; a 2025 study in Jurnal Good Governance found that even in Denpasar, four years after launch, villages still lacked uniform implementation guidelines and adequate resourcing. Scale and institutional durability are well documented; on-the-ground effectiveness is honestly mixed according to independent researchers.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
'Perempuan Perintis' (pioneering women, often village-head spouses) and volunteer cadres, Provincial government monitoring teams

Conditions for success

  • Local regulations embedding gender/child-rights criteria into village planning and budgeting
  • Integration into Indonesia's national Village SDGs monitoring framework

Common failure modes

  • Uneven local resourcing and coordination — some villages lack implementation guidelines even years after adoption
  • Success depends heavily on local coordination quality, per independent case studies

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful