evidoria

What works in Jakarta

All catalogues · Indonesia profile

14
evaluated practices
58/100
average quality score
14%
strong evidence, of 14 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Jakarta

Jakarta has implemented two major technology and infrastructure initiatives with documented results. The Kampung Improvement Programme upgraded approximately 7,700 hectares of informal settlements for roughly 3 million residents at around US$60 per capita, with two-thirds of residents reporting infrastructure improvements by 1976. The Jakarta Smart City & JAKI App achieved a 98.73% completion rate on over 516,000 citizen reports, though only around 30% of complaints received active follow-up and the city ranked 102nd of 141 globally on the IMD Smart City Index in 2023.

Drawn from: Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · MAMPU - Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment · Kampung Improvement Programme — Jakarta's In-Situ Slum-Upgrading Model · Jakarta Smart City & the JAKI App — Citizen-Reporting and Open-Data Command Centre · Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA) — Indonesia's Women- and Child-Friendly Village Programme · Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG/BRGM) — National Rewetting Programme (Indonesia) · BPS 2026 Economic Census — AI-Assisted Business Classification at National Scale · Ruangguru — Indonesia's AI-adaptive tutoring platform at national scale

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced +58 pts 67 here · 9 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced +32 pts 67 here · 35 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +27 pts 67 here · 39 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +16 pts 67 here · 51 average

Evaluation evidence +14 pts 50 here · 36 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -11 pts 56 here · 66 average

Transferability / replicability -16 pts 43 here · 59 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -18 pts 42 here · 60 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -20 pts 33 here · 53 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -23 pts 56 here · 78 average

Effectiveness -31 pts 50 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality -33 pts 50 here · 83 average

Score profile vs peers

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
67 · 9
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
67 · 35
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 39
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
67 · 51
Evaluation evidence
50 · 36
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation level
71 · 64
Scalability & sustainability
70 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Efficiency
50 · 52
Sustainability (ongoing)
76 · 80
Transparency, fairness & accountability
47 · 54
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 66
Transferability / replicability
43 · 59
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured public value
42 · 60
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 53
Documented learning
50 · 73
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
56 · 78
Effectiveness
50 · 81
Impact on gender equality
50 · 83

Coloured bar: Jakarta. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · 96

MAMPU - Australia-Indonesia Partnership for Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment · 85

Kampung Improvement Programme — Jakarta's In-Situ Slum-Upgrading Model · 81

Jakarta Smart City & the JAKI App — Citizen-Reporting and Open-Data Command Centre · 71

Desa Ramah Perempuan dan Peduli Anak (DRPPA) — Indonesia's Women- and Child-Friendly Village Programme · 63

Peatland Restoration Agency (BRG/BRGM) — National Rewetting Programme (Indonesia) · 60

BPS 2026 Economic Census — AI-Assisted Business Classification at National Scale · 60

Ruangguru — Indonesia's AI-adaptive tutoring platform at national scale · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more