evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Dimbangombe Ranch Holistic Planned Grazing — Measured Gains and a Community-Scale Reality Check (Zimbabwe)

Zimbabwe · Victoria Falls · See the Zimbabwe profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 59% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

On its 4,600 ha ranch, Zimbabwe's Africa Centre for Holistic Management measured 31% less bare ground and 56% more litter cover (2001-2009) under holistic planned grazing. Its own parallel monitoring found no watershed gain in the four communal villages meant to replicate it.

-31%
Decrease in bare ground (2001-2009)
+56%
Increase in litter cover (2001-2009)
+12%
Increase in perennial grass plants (2001-2009)
4.4x
Maize yield increase, mobile-kraal plots (2008-2009)
Dimbangombe Ranch Holistic Planned Grazing — Measured Gains and a Community-Scale Reality Check (Zimbabwe) Dimbangombe Ranch Holistic Planned Grazing — Measured Gains and a Community-Scale Reality Check (Zimbabwe)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Africa Centre for Holistic Management (ACHM)
Period
1994-2009 (documented study); ongoing
Keywords
agriculture, livestock, rangeland restoration, community development

Context

The Africa Centre for Holistic Management (ACHM) is a Zimbabwean non-profit on the 4,600-hectare Dimbangombe property near Victoria Falls, donated in 1994 as a demonstration and training site for Holistic Planned Grazing. Multi-species herds are moved through unfenced paddocks under a grazing plan redrawn twice yearly to concentrate hoof action, dung and rest.

Results

Between 2001 and 2009, fixed-point transects recorded a 31% decrease in bare ground, a 56% increase in litter cover, a 12% increase in perennial grass plants, a 21% decrease in undesirable annual grasses, and a 17% decrease in soil movement on the demonstration ranch. A parallel mobile-kraal innovation was reported to more than quadruple (4.4x) maize yields on treated community plots in 2008-2009.

Conclusions

Community-replication monitoring, started 2006 in four neighbouring Hwange communal villages, showed no improvement in watershed health by 2009: too few households combined animals into a single disciplined herd. Independent scientific literature (a peer-reviewed critical review of Savory's method, and Sierra Club, 2017) found holistic grazing's advantages over conventional grazing are inconsistent and not established by controlled, replicated research at the scale publicly claimed, even though component practices are grounded in mainstream rangeland ecology.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Africa Centre for Holistic Management (ACHM), Hwange-area chiefs (trustees), trained regional facilitators

Conditions for success

  • unfenced paddock rotation with grazing plan redrawn twice a year
  • concentrated multi-species herding to drive hoof action, dung and rest
  • over 100 facilitators trained across Southern Africa

Common failure modes

  • community-scale replication in Hwange communal villages showed no watershed-health improvement by 2009 because too few households combined animals into a single disciplined herd

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes LIFE Programme Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful