evidoria

What works in Zimbabwe

All catalogues

13
evaluated practices
41/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 10 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Zimbabwe

Zimbabwe is pursuing digital inclusion and innovation through multiple coordinated initiatives. POTRAZ has commissioned 182 Community Information Centres and upgraded 98 to Digital Centres with Starlink broadband, while distributing 25,000+ computers to schools, though usage remains constrained by low digital literacy; separately, POTRAZ trained 35 persons with disabilities in foundational ICT skills, an effort recognized with a 2026 WSIS Prize. At the university level, the University of Zimbabwe Innovation Hub has enrolled 40+ innovators and formed 21 graduate start-up companies, while Zimbabwe Open University certified 78 educators in its AI for Educators programme in May 2026, with 110+ additional educators from five other African countries participating. These initiatives reflect a national strategy to expand digital access, support persons with disabilities, commercialize university research, and build AI capacity—though evidence is primarily descriptive, with limited outcome data on downstream impact.

Drawn from: POTRAZ & Internet Society Zimbabwe — Digital Skills Training for Persons with Disabilities · POTRAZ Digital Centres – National Rural Digital Access Network, Zimbabwe · University of Zimbabwe Innovation Hub — From Lab IP to Commercial Start-Ups · ZOU AI for Educators — Zimbabwe Open University's National Teacher AI Certification Programme · Zimbabwe CAMPFIRE — Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources · RAIET Trainer-of-Trainers — Zimbabwe's Cascade Model for National Robotics and AI Teacher Training · Citizens Scorecard — Zimbabwe's AI-Analysed WhatsApp Platform for Rating Local Council Services · Zimbabwe Section 124 — 60 Reserved Parliamentary Seats for Women (2013 Constitution)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Curator validation +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +13 pts 50 here · 37 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Sustainability -12 pts 67 here · 78 average

Innovation level -14 pts 49 here · 63 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -20 pts 11 here · 31 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -22 pts 25 here · 48 average

Evidence of learning impact -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Governance, certification & transferability -31 pts 33 here · 64 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -37 pts 22 here · 59 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -37 pts 17 here · 54 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Documented learning -74 pts 0 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -77 pts 0 here · 77 average

Achievement / evidence -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -91 pts 0 here · 91 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Curator validation
100 · 74
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 37
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 7
Scalability & sustainability
62 · 64
Equity & inclusion
50 · 52
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 50
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Sustainability
67 · 78
Innovation level
49 · 63
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
11 · 31
Transparency, ethics & data protection
25 · 48
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 28
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured public value
22 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
17 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 44
Documented learning
0 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 77
Achievement / evidence
0 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 91

Coloured bar: Zimbabwe. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

POTRAZ & Internet Society Zimbabwe — Digital Skills Training for Persons with Disabilities · 68

POTRAZ Digital Centres – National Rural Digital Access Network, Zimbabwe · 68

University of Zimbabwe Innovation Hub — From Lab IP to Commercial Start-Ups · 57

ZOU AI for Educators — Zimbabwe Open University's National Teacher AI Certification Programme · 53

Zimbabwe CAMPFIRE — Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources · 47

RAIET Trainer-of-Trainers — Zimbabwe's Cascade Model for National Robotics and AI Teacher Training · 40

Citizens Scorecard — Zimbabwe's AI-Analysed WhatsApp Platform for Rating Local Council Services · 40

Zimbabwe Section 124 — 60 Reserved Parliamentary Seats for Women (2013 Constitution) · 37

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Zimbabwe concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more