evidoria

What works in Zimbabwe

All catalogues

21
evaluated practices
44/100
average quality score
5%
strong evidence, of 19 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Zimbabwe

Drawn from: Freedom Fone — Open-Source IVR Toolkit Letting Community Groups Build Voice Services for Non-Literate Users · EcoCash — Econet's Mobile Money Service That Outgrew Zimbabwe's Banking System · POTRAZ & Internet Society Zimbabwe — Digital Skills Training for Persons with Disabilities · POTRAZ Digital Centres – National Rural Digital Access Network, Zimbabwe · University of Zimbabwe Innovation Hub — From Lab IP to Commercial Start-Ups · ZOU AI for Educators — Zimbabwe Open University's National Teacher AI Certification Programme · Gateway to Elation's Accessible Digital Civic Participation Project for Blind Zimbabweans · ZIDA — Zimbabwe's One-Stop Investment Agency and Its Uneven Path to Faster Approvals

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Impact on gender equality +30 pts 100 here · 70 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +12 pts 50 here · 38 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -10 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -13 pts 44 here · 57 average

Sustainability -15 pts 62 here · 78 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -16 pts 11 here · 27 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -18 pts 56 here · 74 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -22 pts 25 here · 47 average

Governance, certification & transferability -23 pts 41 here · 64 average

Evidence of learning impact -26 pts 0 here · 26 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -32 pts 22 here · 54 average

Efficiency -32 pts 0 here · 32 average

Documented learning -49 pts 25 here · 74 average

Effectiveness -66 pts 0 here · 66 average

Achievement / evidence -87 pts 0 here · 87 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -89 pts 0 here · 89 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Impact on gender equality
100 · 70
Curator validation
100 · 73
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 38
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 6
Equity & inclusion
50 · 50
Demonstrated reach
75 · 76
Scalability & sustainability
60 · 62
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
44 · 48
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
44 · 48
Innovation level
55 · 62
Transferability / replicability
52 · 60
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evidence of impact / measured public value
44 · 57
Sustainability
62 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
11 · 27
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
56 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
25 · 47
Governance, certification & transferability
41 · 64
Evidence of learning impact
0 · 26
Transparency, fairness & accountability
22 · 54
Efficiency
0 · 32
Documented learning
25 · 74
Effectiveness
0 · 66
Achievement / evidence
0 · 87
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 89

Coloured bar: Zimbabwe. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Freedom Fone — Open-Source IVR Toolkit Letting Community Groups Build Voice Services for Non-Literate Users · 76

EcoCash — Econet's Mobile Money Service That Outgrew Zimbabwe's Banking System · 71

POTRAZ & Internet Society Zimbabwe — Digital Skills Training for Persons with Disabilities · 68

POTRAZ Digital Centres – National Rural Digital Access Network, Zimbabwe · 68

University of Zimbabwe Innovation Hub — From Lab IP to Commercial Start-Ups · 57

ZOU AI for Educators — Zimbabwe Open University's National Teacher AI Certification Programme · 53

Gateway to Elation's Accessible Digital Civic Participation Project for Blind Zimbabweans · 52

ZIDA — Zimbabwe's One-Stop Investment Agency and Its Uneven Path to Faster Approvals · 48

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Zimbabwe concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more