evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

e-Shram — India's National Registry for Informal Workers, and Its Accessibility Gap

India · New Delhi · See the India profile · See the New Delhi profile

Top 30% 84/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Launched in 2021, India's e-Shram portal has registered over 310 million informal workers into a national database, but independent reviews find only a fraction gain real benefits — a cautionary case on the gap between digital registration and inclusive design.

e-Shram — India's National Registry for Informal Workers, and Its Accessibility Gap

Details

Promoter
Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India
Period
2021-2025
Keywords
informal labour, social protection, digital ID, government services

Description

Launched on 26 August 2021 by India's Ministry of Labour and Employment, the e-Shram portal set out to build the country's first unified digital database of unorganised-sector workers — domestic workers, street vendors, construction labourers, gig and platform workers — who fall outside formal social protection.

By August 2025, more than 31 crore (310 million+) workers had registered, nominally linking them to 20 welfare and employment schemes spread across 11 government ministries (The India Forum, 2026).

Independent reviews, however, document a portal that is difficult for its own target users to navigate: WIEGO (2023) and reporting by Scroll.in and ThePrint found a hard-to-decipher CAPTCHA, address fields workers describe as confusing, data that must be typed twice with no copy-paste function, and a two-OTP verification flow that assumes reliable phone and network access. More than 80% of registrations are completed through paid Common Service Centre (CSC) intermediaries charging roughly Rs 20-30 per registration — a de facto access tax on the workers the scheme is meant to serve.

The impact gap is stark: The India Forum (2026) reports that as of 2024 only around 51 lakh (5.1 million) of registrants — about 0.16% — had gone on to enrol in the flagship PM-SYM pension scheme, and WIEGO concludes registration "has not translated into any substantial new benefits" for most workers. Civil-society groups and volunteers have stepped in with door-to-door registration drives to close the gap the platform's own design leaves open.

e-Shram is included here as a cautionary case: at national scale, a digital registry alone does not equal digital inclusion. Interface choices (CAPTCHA, limited language support, no offline-first flow) and the downstream linkage from registration to actual benefit delivery matter as much as raw reach.

Read the full analysis: https://www.theindiaforum.in/forum/registered-not-reached-why-indias-welfare-schemes-informal-workers-fall-short

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful