evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

EMBRAPII — Brazil's Co-Funded Industrial Research Network Linking Companies to Accredited Research Units

Brazil · Brasília · See the Brazil profile · See the Brasília profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 50% 67/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A Brazilian public 'social organisation' co-funding pre-competitive industrial R&D one-third each from EMBRAPII, the company and the research unit, hitting a record R\$1bn in projects in 2024 despite academic critique of slower-than-hoped uptake.

440 projects
Projects contracted (2023) (2023)
431 companies
Companies engaged (2023) (2023)
677 BRL million
Financing volume (2023) (2023)
610 projects
Projects contracted (2024) (2024)
1000 BRL million
Financing volume (2024) (2024)
34% %
Share of 2024 financing from EMBRAPII (2024)
50% %
Share of 2024 financing from contracting companies (2024)
16% %
Share of 2024 financing from research units (2024)
EMBRAPII — Brazil's Co-Funded Industrial Research Network Linking Companies to Accredited Research Units

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
EMBRAPII (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa e Inovação Industrial)
Period
2013–present
Keywords
industrial R&D, applied research, innovation finance

Context

EMBRAPII (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa e Inovacao Industrial) was created by the Brazilian federal government in 2013 as a qualified 'social organisation' to close the gap between Brazil's public research institutes and its industrial base.

Objectives

Co-fund pre-competitive industrial R&D projects between companies and accredited research units, reducing companies' cash exposure while keeping research units demand-driven.

Activities

A company brings a pre-competitive innovation problem to an EMBRAPII-accredited research unit (universities, SENAI institutes, and other technical centres), and the resulting project is typically co-funded in thirds by EMBRAPII, the company and the research unit's own resources. The model has also been extended into SME-productivity work through the Brasil Mais Produtivo programme, which uses a Smart Industry Readiness Index assessment.

Results

EMBRAPII contracted 440 projects with 431 companies nationwide in 2023, worth R$677 million, then grew to 610 projects and roughly R$1 billion in financing in 2024 - of which 34% came directly from EMBRAPII, 50% from the contracting companies and 16% from the research units themselves, with a record share of that portfolio going to micro and small enterprises and startups.

Conclusions

A 2023 peer-reviewed study (Guimaraes & Barcelos) describes EMBRAPII as an innovative departure from Brazil's conventional science-and-technology policy instruments, crediting its governance model, but notes that the number of companies actually engaged has been lower than initial ambitions suggested. No large-scale, independent counterfactual impact evaluation was located, so the underlying causal effect on firm-level innovation outcomes remains less firmly established than the funding-volume figures.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Co-funded in thirds by EMBRAPII, the contracting company and the research unit; total financing reached roughly R$1 billion in 2024.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Operating continuously since 2013, with project volume and financing both growing year-on-year through 2024.
Staffing & skills
EMBRAPII (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa e Inovacao Industrial), Accredited research units (universities, SENAI institutes, technical centres)

Conditions for success

  • Tripartite co-funding (EMBRAPII/company/research unit) that reduces company cash exposure while keeping research units demand-driven
  • Pre-competitive project scope, so results aren't restricted to a single competitor

Common failure modes

  • An independent 2023 academic assessment notes company uptake has been lower than initial ambitions suggested
  • No large-scale independent counterfactual evaluation of firm-level innovation outcomes was located

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful