evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

femLINKpacific Women's Weather Watch — Community Women Leading Disaster Early Warning and Climate Response, Fiji (2004–present)

Fiji · Suva · See the Fiji profile · See the Suva profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 45% 74/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2004, femLINKpacific's Women's Weather Watch connects rural Fijian women via SMS and radio to the Fiji Met Office. By 2016, it engaged 165 groups representing 48,000 women and 99,593 households. WMO recognises it as a gender best practice in disaster risk reduction.

165
Community women-led groups engaged (Jan-Apr 2016)
48,000+
Women represented (Jan-Apr 2016)
99,593
Households represented (Jan-Apr 2016)
femLINKpacific Women's Weather Watch — Community Women Leading Disaster Early Warning and Climate Response, Fiji (2004–present)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
femLINKpacific
Period
2004–present
Keywords
disaster risk reduction, climate adaptation, community media, women's leadership, early warning systems

Context

femLINKpacific, a Fiji-based women's media organisation, created the Women's Weather Watch (WWW) in 2004 after floods in Vanua Levu revealed that rural women were never consulted about their disaster experiences.

Activities

The programme links roughly 350 trained rural women monitors via SMS and community radio to the Fiji Meteorological Service and National Disaster Management Office; each monitor relays real-time weather and preparedness information into her community, with an explicit mandate to reach women with disabilities and LGBTQI+ women.

Results

In a four-month window (January-April 2016), femLINKpacific documented engagement with 165 community women-led groups, representing over 48,000 women and 99,593 households. The World Meteorological Organization formally recognised WWW as a gender best practice in disaster risk reduction, UN Women drew on the model for its Pacific Women's Resilience to Disasters work, and it was later adapted for Vanuatu.

Conclusions

No independent peer-reviewed impact evaluation exists; the evidence rests on WMO recognition and on femLINKpacific's and ActionAid Australia's own documentation, with no published cost-effectiveness data.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 84

Women in Life Science Denmark

Denmark

The network dedicated to enhancing Danish Life Science focuses on advancing diversity within executive and senior specialist roles across both …