evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Generative AI as a Teaching Partner for Personalised Learning Paths — Dar es Salaam and Dodoma, Tanzania

Tanzania · Dar es Salaam · See the Tanzania profile · See the Dar es Salaam profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 73% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A study of 120 Tanzanian secondary teachers (Dar es Salaam, Dodoma) using ChatGPT/Grok for lesson plans and quizzes found engagement rose 2.8→4.3/5 and test scores 61%→75% (paired pre/post, no control group), while candidly flagging rural infrastructure gaps.

120 teachers
Teachers participating (2025-2026)
2.8 to 4.3 score (1-5 scale)
Student engagement (pre to post) (2025-2026)
61 to 75 %
Mean test scores (pre to post) (2025-2026)

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Open University of Tanzania
Period
2025–2026
Keywords
generative AI, lesson planning, secondary education

Context

Researcher Juliana Kamaghe of the Open University of Tanzania studied how generative AI tools can help secondary-school teachers build personalised learning paths for students, across schools in Dar es Salaam (urban) and Dodoma (semi-urban/rural).

Activities

120 teachers used accessible generative AI tools - principally ChatGPT and Grok, alongside Curipod and MagicSchool.ai - to generate weekly lesson plans aligned to national syllabus objectives, automatically produce quizzes with adaptive difficulty, and tailor content to student diagnostic profiles. The study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods design: a quantitative pre/post strand (paired t-tests) on student engagement, test performance and teacher workload, combined with usage logs, open-ended surveys and focus groups.

Results

Reported results include student engagement rising from 2.8 to 4.3 on a 5-point scale and mean test scores rising from 61% to 75%, alongside teacher-reported reductions in lesson-prep workload; teachers described the tools as intuitive and useful for differentiating instruction. There was no no-AI control group, so the reported gains cannot be cleanly separated from novelty effects, teacher enthusiasm, or concurrent instruction changes, and self-reported workload/engagement measures may be optimistic.

Conclusions

The authors are candid that rural schools, more prevalent around Dodoma, face persistent connectivity, device and training gaps that limit equitable scale-up, positioning this as an encouraging pilot rather than a proven, ready-to-scale model.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Single researcher (Juliana Kamaghe, Open University of Tanzania), 120 participating secondary-school teachers across Dar es Salaam and Dodoma

Conditions for success

  • Teacher access to accessible generative AI tools (ChatGPT, Grok, Curipod, MagicSchool.ai)
  • Alignment of AI-generated lesson plans and quizzes to the national syllabus

Common failure modes

  • No no-AI control group, so reported gains cannot be cleanly attributed to the AI tools rather than novelty or concurrent changes
  • Persistent rural connectivity, device and training gaps around Dodoma limiting equitable scale-up
  • Self-reported workload/engagement measures may be optimistic

Where it fits

Governance type
research-led pilot (not ministry-mandated)
Scale
two-city pilot (120 teachers)
Income level
low income

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful