Switzerland's migration agency is running a randomized trial of GeoMatch, an algorithm recommending which canton should host an asylum-seeking family to maximise employment odds. Backtesting projected large gains; live three-year outcomes are still pending.
15 %
Employment rate within three years, 2013 cohort (historical baseline) (2013 cohort)
26 %
Projected employment rate under algorithmic assignment (backtested) (2013 cohort, backtested)
1,000+
Refugee families placed in the pilot RCT to date
Details
Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Swiss State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), with Stanford Immigration Policy Lab
Period
2020–ongoing (randomized controlled trial)
Keywords
migration policy, refugee resettlement, labour-market integration, public administration
Context
GeoMatch is a machine-learning tool developed by researchers at the Stanford Immigration Policy Lab, in partnership with Switzerland's State Secretariat for Migration (SEM), to recommend which Swiss canton an asylum-seeking family should be resettled to in order to maximise their chances of finding employment. Since 2020, SEM has run the tool inside a randomized controlled trial: roughly half of arriving families receive an algorithmic recommendation for canton placement, while the rest are placed following standard practice.
Results
Backtesting the algorithm on historical Swiss placement data — a 2013 cohort in which only 15% of resettled refugees found work within three years — researchers projected that algorithmic assignment could have raised that employment rate to around 26%, a 73–75% relative improvement, according to peer-reviewed methodology published by the Immigration Policy Lab. The pilot RCT has placed more than 1,000 refugee families to date.
Conclusions
This headline improvement figure comes from retrospective backtesting, not yet from the live government RCT itself. As of the most recent public reporting, three-year employment outcomes from the actual trial were still pending analysis, so the real-world impact of GeoMatch as deployed by SEM remains to be confirmed rather than established.
Implementation
Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Academic-government research partnership; no specific budget figures disclosed for the pilot.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — RCT running since 2020, having placed 1,000+ families; three-year outcome analysis is still pending.
Staffing & skills
Stanford Immigration Policy Lab researchers, Swiss State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) placement officials
Conditions for success
Randomized trial design enabling a rigorous comparison to standard placement practice
Peer-reviewed matching algorithm
Government willingness to run a live RCT rather than a direct rollout
Common failure modes
Live three-year RCT employment outcomes are not yet published, so real-world impact remains unconfirmed
Where it fits
Governance type
national government with academic partnership
Scale
national (pilot)
Income level
high-income
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Sierra Leone's National Medical Supplies Agency and University of Pennsylvania researchers built a decision-aware ML tool that raised essential-medicine consumption …