evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ghent's Commons Transition Plan — Mapping the City as a Partner to Its Commons

Belgium · Ghent · See the Belgium profile · See the Ghent profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 93% 43/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

In 2016 Ghent commissioned Michel Bauwens and the P2P Foundation to map its grassroots 'commons' initiatives and recommend a shift from command-and-control to a partner-city role; mapping found 500+ active projects, but implementation follow-through is only partially documented.

500+
Commons-oriented initiatives mapped across Ghent
Ghent's Commons Transition Plan — Mapping the City as a Partner to Its Commons

Details

Promoter
City of Ghent / P2P Foundation
Period
2016–2017
Region (NUTS)
BE23
Keywords
urban commons, participatory governance, civic innovation policy, commons-based peer production

Context

In 2016 the City of Ghent (Flanders, Belgium) commissioned commons researcher Michel Bauwens and the P2P Foundation, working with Yurek Onzia, to investigate how local government could support and formally partner with the city's grassroots "commons" economy — citizen-run initiatives in food, energy, digital infrastructure, coworking and neighbourhood care — rather than simply regulate or fund them case by case.

Objectives

The research aimed to identify concrete governance changes that would let the city formally partner with commons initiatives, including replacing competitive calls for individual institutions with "calls for commons" that reward coalitions of complementary partners, and establishing a partner-city unit inside the administration.

Activities

The research team mapped more than 500 commons-oriented initiatives across Ghent, from fablabs and coworking spaces to food cooperatives and energy communities, and interviewed civic organisers and city officials. The resulting Commons Transition Plan was published in 2017.

Results

The plan's own preliminary findings were candid about limitations: while Ghent's city administration was found to be genuinely engaged for the long term, city services remained sectorally fragmented, and citizen-led commons initiatives — though numerous and dynamic — were themselves fragmented, with only some sectors (notably food and energy) more organisationally mature than others. Ghent's approach influenced how other European cities, including Amsterdam and Madrid, discussed commons-based urban governance, and the plan remains a frequently cited reference case in commons and P2P-Foundation literature. No independent follow-up evaluation quantifying adoption of the plan's recommendations or downstream outcomes was found in public sources.

Conclusions

The plan is best read as an evidenced diagnostic and policy roadmap rather than a programme with measured outcomes: a useful early-stage model for cities beginning to formalise a relationship with their commons economy, but one whose on-the-ground implementation and impact are not yet independently verified.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No cost figures are published; the scope was a commissioned research/mapping and policy-roadmap engagement (external researcher plus interviews), not a funded implementation programme.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Commissioned in 2016; the Commons Transition Plan was published in 2017; no reported timeline exists for implementation of its recommendations.
Staffing & skills
Commissioned by the City of Ghent to commons researcher Michel Bauwens and the P2P Foundation, working with Yurek Onzia, Research team conducted mapping and interviews with civic organisers and city officials

Conditions for success

  • City administration engagement was found to be genuine and long-term
  • An existing base of 500+ commons-oriented citizen initiatives to build on
  • Food and energy sectors were already organisationally mature enough to act as early partners

Common failure modes

  • City services remained sectorally fragmented, complicating a unified partner-city approach
  • Citizen-led commons initiatives were themselves fragmented, with maturity uneven across sectors
  • No independent follow-up evaluation of whether recommendations (e.g. 'calls for commons', partner-city unit) were adopted, or of their impact

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal government commissioning external research and a policy roadmap
Scale
city (Ghent)
Income level
high income

Commonly funded by

Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful