evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Patti di Collaborazione — Bologna's Regulation for the Care and Regeneration of Urban Commons

Italy · Bologna · See the Italy profile · See the Bologna profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 22% 81/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Bologna's 2014 regulation lets citizen groups sign 'Pacts of Collaboration' with the city to co-manage public spaces. Over 400 pacts have been signed, and roughly 280 Italian municipalities have since adopted the model, though evaluation found uneven economic sustainability.

400 pacts
Pacts signed (2014-present)
280 pacts
Pacts analysed in LabGov evaluation (March 2014-December 2016)
54 municipalities
Municipalities adopting similar regulation (September 2015)
79 municipalities
Municipalities under evaluation (September 2015)
280 municipalities
Municipalities adopting similar regulation (mid-2020s)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Municipality of Bologna
Period
2014–present
Keywords
urban commons, participatory governance, civic collaboration, public space regeneration

Context

On 19 May 2014, the Municipality of Bologna approved the 'Regulation on public collaboration between citizens and the city for the care and regeneration of urban commons,' the first measure of its kind in Italy, developed with the civic think-tank Labsus and based on the constitutional principle of subsidiarity.

Objectives

To create a legal mechanism, the 'Patto di Collaborazione' (Pact of Collaboration), through which self-organised groups of residents could agree with the city on responsibilities for maintaining a garden, restoring a building, or running a community space.

Activities

Citizens propose care or regeneration projects for shared urban spaces — parks, walls, playgrounds, disused buildings — and the municipality supports them with technical assistance, materials, insurance cover or small grants, while retaining oversight through district-level administration.

Results

More than 400 pacts have been signed since 2014, spanning environmental care, cultural programming, social services and neighbourhood regeneration. An independent academic evaluation coordinated by LabGov analysed 280 pacts signed between March 2014 and December 2016, combining qualitative and quantitative coding, participant surveys and focus groups. It found the mechanism built meaningful social capital and democratic responsiveness, but also flagged structural weaknesses: few pacts involved multi-actor partnerships (most were single-group agreements) and underlying economic models were often fragile, relying on volunteer time rather than durable funding. The city received the 2018 Cities of Service 'Engaged Cities Award'. By September 2015, 54 other Italian municipalities had adopted similar regulations, with 79 more under evaluation; by the mid-2020s that number had grown to roughly 280 municipalities, and the approach has been studied — though not directly replicated — by cities including Amsterdam, Ghent and Madrid.

Conclusions

Legal innovation alone does not guarantee balanced, well-resourced partnerships — sustained public investment and multi-actor engagement remain works in progress even in the mechanism's home city.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Municipality of Bologna district-level administration (oversight), Labsus civic think-tank (regulation design partner), LabGov (independent academic evaluators)

Conditions for success

  • A clear legal/regulatory basis grounded in the constitutional principle of subsidiarity
  • Municipal technical assistance, materials, insurance cover or small grants to support citizen-led projects
  • District-level oversight to balance citizen autonomy with accountability

Common failure modes

  • Most pacts remained single-group agreements rather than genuine multi-actor partnerships
  • Underlying economic models were often fragile, relying on volunteer time rather than durable funding
  • No sanction mechanism identified for weak-performing pacts

Where it fits

Governance type
municipal
Scale
city
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful