evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

GPT@EC at the European Ombudsman — Guardrailed Generative AI for Case-Handling Support

France · Strasbourg · See the France profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 50% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The European Ombudsman is piloting the EU Commission's GPT@EC generative-AI tool for legal research and drafting support, explicitly barred from taking decisions or prioritising complaints. Governance is strong; measured efficiency gains are not yet published.

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Office of the European Ombudsman
Period
2025-ongoing (pilot)
Keywords
administrative complaints oversight, EU institutional compliance

Context

The Office of the European Ombudsman, which investigates maladministration across EU institutions, has launched a pilot use of GPT@EC — a secure generative-AI tool built by the European Commission's Directorate-General for Digital Services on Microsoft Azure OpenAI infrastructure, offered to EU bodies for shared use in ancillary tasks.

Activities

Staff may use GPT@EC to research applicable law and case law, summarise and analyse large or complex documents and datasets, and support administrative drafting and communications. The Office's published rules state that 'AI is not used to take decisions, make recommendations, assess admissibility, determine outcomes, or prioritise complaints' — those functions remain exclusively with human staff, who must verify all AI output before use.

Results

Governance safeguards are unusually detailed for a young pilot: a registered Data Protection Officer record, a completed data-protection impact assessment, a Service Level Agreement keeping Ombudsman data inaccessible to European Commission staff, a public AI-use notice, and a contractual guarantee that no processed data is used to train or improve the underlying models. As of the 2025 Annual Report, the Office (75 permanent staff, roughly 8 contract agents, 18 trainees) describes anticipated gains in speed and quality but publishes no measured figures on case-handling time, backlog, or output quality.

Conclusions

The European Commission's own digital-strategy office lists GPT@EC as part of a wider set of GenAI pilots trialled across EU public administrations, suggesting a path to reuse beyond this one office — but this remains a governance-first, evidence-later deployment.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — No budget figure published; GPT@EC is a shared Commission-built tool on Microsoft Azure OpenAI infrastructure offered to EU bodies, implying low marginal cost to the Ombudsman's office itself.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Pilot launched 2025 and ongoing as of the 2025 Annual Report; no end date announced.
Staffing & skills
Office of the European Ombudsman (75 permanent staff, ~8 contract agents, 18 trainees), European Commission Directorate-General for Digital Services (tool provider)

Conditions for success

  • A registered Data Protection Officer record and completed data-protection impact assessment before go-live
  • A Service Level Agreement keeping the Ombudsman's data inaccessible to European Commission staff
  • A hard rule barring the tool from taking decisions, making recommendations, assessing admissibility or prioritising complaints
  • Mandatory human verification of all AI output before use

Where it fits

Governance type
EU institution
Scale
single EU institution/office
Income level
high_income

Commonly funded by

European Urban Initiative

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful